We believe that it is crucial for AI content detectors reported accuracy to be open, transparent, and accountable. The reality is, each person seeking AI-detection services deserves to know which detector is the most accurate for their specific use case.
Socratic is best known as Google’s free AI-powered learning app that connects students with online resources. Learn about the history of Socratic, from its early development to its acquisition by Google. Plus, get insight into key statistics like traffic sources and financials.
ZeroGPT is a tool designed to detect whether a given text is generated by an AI tool like ChatGPT or Google Bard, or if a human writes it. Users can enter their text and analyze it with the tool’s complex algorithms, which use DeepAnalyse™ technology to determine its origin. The tool claims an accuracy rate
AI is transforming how businesses operate and individuals live. As AI capabilities grow, so does the number of AI tools available to leverage these capabilities. As with most other industries which have plenty of options to choose from, AI directory sites have emerged as helpful resources for discovering and evaluating various tools and solutions.
ContentDetector.AI is a free online tool that identifies any text material that is AI-generated, including Chat GPT, GPT 3, and GPT 4 written content, and provides an estimated percentage score based on the likelihood that the content was generated by AI tools or software. It also includes a word count feature. The tool is useful
The future of artificial intelligence is here, and its name is GPT-4. Developed by OpenAI, GPT-4 is the newest and most advanced model in deep learning, capable of processing text and image inputs to produce human-like outputs. While still not entirely on par with human abilities, GPT-4 has already achieved impressive feats in various benchmarks.
The importance of detecting AI-generated texts is paramount, particularly when it comes to online content. Search engines like Google value originality and quality over all else, meaning that low-quality content can lead to penalties that drastically lower search engine rankings – ultimately reducing website traffic and visibility. Similarly, students increasingly rely on AI tools based
Ever since ChatGPT and other AI content creation launched into the mainstream, one question has been on the tip of many users' tongues. Can my audience, AI content detectors, or Google detect AI content, and if so, is there a way to get around AI detector algorithms?
We believe that it is crucial for AI content detectors reported accuracy to be open, transparent, and accountable. The reality is, each person seeking AI-detection services deserves to know which detector is the most accurate for their specific use case.
A lot of questions have come up about how our AI content detection works and achieves the 98% accuracy (Lite) and 99%+ accuracy (Turbo) for modern AI text generation tools. Here is the nitty gritty details provided by our engineering team communicating how they trained the most accurate AI content detection tool.
Even our own AI detector is not perfect, and can produce false positives. These false positives can be very painful for anyone who creates original content — whether you’re a student wrongly accused of using ChatGPT by TurnItIn or GPTZero or a writer who received a false positive from Originality.ai.
Get insight into the reading age of political speeches. Find out which candidates use the lowest reading age, which ones alter the reading age based on where their speech is, and how political speeches have changed in recent times.
When it comes to academic plagiarism, teachers and students alike need to have versatile tools on their side not just to find instances of plagiarism but also to prevent it before ever turning the paper in. That’s where the SafeAssign plagiarism checker comes in. But does it really do the job? We take a closer