Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
Of the 10 amendments that make up the US Bill of Rights, none are more relevant to writers and publishers than the first. The First Amendment of the US Constitution gives individuals and the press the right to free speech, allowing individuals to write and publish without government interference.
At least to a certain extent.
While the First Amendment offers protection in most freedom of speech cases, there are certain situations where it doesn’t apply. Granted, some of these exceptions have been around for a while, but with the shift from traditional print journalism to online content being created by bloggers and the use of artificial intelligence, the issue has become more complicated than ever.
One of the primary questions surrounds the rights of online content creators. Do online content creators have the same First Amendment protections as journalists? Or are they on their own?
In this article, we hope to clarify the First Amendment rights for writers and publishers. We’ll explore what is and what isn’t currently covered by the amendment and how it applies to online content and artificial intelligence.
The First Amendment of the Bill of Rights is as follows:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” (Source: Constitution Annotated)
While they may have been originally created for an offline world, it’s easy to see examples of these rights online as well. For example, you could consider social media platforms and discussion forums as places for people to assemble, and there are plenty of certainly religious websites out there as well.
But, of course, the section about the freedom of speech and the press is the one most relevant to writers and publishers. This guarantees that generally speaking, you can create and distribute content on just about whatever you like without fear of government censorship.
The key words though, are “just about” — you don’t have total freedom when it comes to what you write and publish, whether it's online or not.
According to the American Library Association in their article on the First Amendment, freedom of speech does not cover:
So, as long as writers and publishers steer clear of these categories of unprotected speech, your publications should be protected by the First Amendment.
However, these protections were in place long before the digital age. Does this mean they apply to online content creators like bloggers as well?
Just like print journalists, bloggers are indeed protected by the First Amendment. In fact, everyone has had the right to freedom of speech on the internet since 1997.
In Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment protects internet communications to the same extent as print publications. But it wasn’t until the defamation case of Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox that bloggers were officially given the same freedom of speech protections as traditional journalists.
While online content writers can enjoy their First Amendment protections when posting on a traditional website, things are a little different when it comes to social media sites.
Since they’re privately owned, the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee notes that social media platforms like Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and Reddit aren’t bound by the First Amendment. This means they can moderate the content on their sites as they see fit without violating anyone’s First Amendment rights.
But this doesn’t mean that they aren't experiencing any pushback. According to a Reuters article, Texas and Florida have passed similar laws attempting to restrict the power of social media companies to demote or delete user content. However, the US Supreme Court has yet to deliver a verdict.
And the First Amendment-related issues on the internet don’t stop there — enter artificial intelligence.
If we’re talking about ChatGPT and similar generative AI programs, then no, according to Yale Law School, artificial intelligence itself isn’t protected by the First Amendment.
Large language models and the like may produce some human-like content, sure, but technologies don’t have rights — people do. Therefore, the question shouldn't be about whether AI programs have rights. It should be about whether the First Amendment protects the use of generative AI.
And the answer is…not quite clear yet.
Technically, since some courts have established that computer code counts as speech and can receive First Amendment protections, AI use should fall under that category. Yet if you look at some of the recent court cases surrounding AI and defamation (which, if you can recall, is not protected by the right to freedom of speech), people are suing the AI companies and not the users.
So, while the use of generative AI should receive First Amendment protections, who is ultimately liable for unprotected speech is still up in the air. In the meantime, if you or your writers use AI writing tools for content creation, then it’s best to use them carefully if you want to avoid potential defamation lawsuits of your own.
For example, you could use an AI checker to scan web content and then take a closer look at any sections that may have been generated by artificial intelligence.
If AI creates statements in your content that could be considered defamatory, obscene, or another form of unprotected speech, edit or remove them to avoid liability.
The First Amendment offers many protections to writers and publishers, but it’s important to keep in mind that the right to freedom of speech isn’t totally free. There are unprotected forms of speech that you should avoid in your content, whether you’re an online content writer or print journalist.
It should be noted that with the rapidly evolving nature of technology and the internet, the rules could change. The slow-moving legal system is having a hard time keeping up with the latest advancements, so the First Amendment protections for writers and publishers today could very well change in the near future.
Keep an eye on the news and stick to the protected forms of speech to stay well within your First Amendment rights.
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
