When generative AI writing tools first became mainstream, many believed they would replace copywriting altogether. However, it rapidly became clear that this wouldn’t be the case (at least in the short term), considering that fully generated articles often lack depth, empathy, and a uniquely human perspective.
As a result, many decided they couldn’t use generative AI for content marketing efforts. Yet, if used correctly, generative AI can be an incredible tool for research.
Review the pros and cons of using AI tools for research in the context of content marketing. Find out how to use AI for research and make the most of it without relying on it too heavily.
Generative AI creates written content based on provided prompts using a large language model (LLM). LLMs are often trained on vast swathes of datasets, allowing them to quickly understand a prompt, scour its data sets, and produce clear, coherent, and accurate responses.
As such, these tools are extremely effective for research in many ways.
One of the biggest benefits of using generative AI for research is its ability to rapidly gather and process large volumes of information.
Rather than spending hours scrolling through Google results and then reading relevant articles, AI tools accomplish this in a matter of seconds — significantly speeding up research and improving efficiency.
Generative AI tools are fantastic for idea generation, acting as a sounding board for new ideas and concepts for content marketing strategy.
With the right prompting, generative AI tools like ChatGPT can suggest new content for current verticals, new verticals that suit your target audience, and even new publishing ideas.
Generative AI is also excellent for creating detailed article drafts. It sets foundations that skilled content marketers and writers can develop and tailor more specifically to their brand tone of voice and target audience.
Not only does this save valuable writing time, but it also ensures that any content you create isn’t missing any essential elements that your audience or Google are expecting.
AI tools are also superb for quickly condensing long documents or research papers and turning them into easy-to-understand, concise summaries.
This approach allows you to rapidly work through detailed content and consume more in a short space of time.
Lastly, generative AI tools expand potential sources of information by breaking down language barriers.
Have you heard about an incredible article or paper on your subject, but you can only find it written in another language? Previously, that would’ve been a hurdle too far for many, but with the help of generative AI tools, you can quickly translate the content into your chosen language and use it in your content creation process.
However, while there are several pros to using generative AI for research, there are also a few cons to be aware of, one of which is accuracy.
AI tools like ChatGPT are renowned for generating incorrect or misleading information (for example, AI hallucinations). So, it’s crucial to undertake fact-checking when generating content.
Depending on which AI tool you use, you may also find that the chosen tool generates information that is no longer relevant or is outdated. Some AI models don’t have access to the most recent data due to training. As a result, you may miss out on recent research in a particular subject or field.
AI tools aren’t capable of coming up with their own ideas. Instead, they pull from what is already published. So, you might also find that AI-generated content is superficial and only covers the surface of a topic because it lacks a nuanced understanding of the human perspective.
Another issue with AI-generated content is that AI can perpetuate biases due to its training data, leading to biases or even ethical concerns.
There are many ways to use generative AI for research. However, it’s important to keep an eye on the potential issues that may arise along the way.
As always, you should continue to be 100% transparent with your audience about using AI in content creation and avoid relying too heavily on it for the more intricate parts of content strategy.
Reviewing the presence of AI-generated content on your website? Use the Originality.ai Site Scanner to review your entire website for AI content in 1 click.
No. AI is a tool that complements research efforts, but it can’t replicate or replace critical thinking and expertise.
While AI can offer valuable insights, you must conduct fact-checking to verify that what is being produced is truly accurate and up-to-date.
Whenever you use generative AI for research purposes, you should always verify information, ensure it is up-to-date, take a collaborative AI and human approach, and ensure you are not over reliant on your chosen tools.
We looked at all lawsuits occurring against OpenAI and listed them below. In addition to the relevant detail we had a lawyer provide some commentary. This list will remain updated as an easy-to-reference location for any lawsuits against OpenAI ordered by date (oldest to newest).