Try the Most Accurate AI Detector on the Market
Our patented AI checker is the most accurate detector on the market! Don't believe us? Try it for yourself!
Try for FREE Here!
AI Studies

4600% Surge in AI Canadian Online Bank Reviews: 2018 to 2025

Is that Canadian Online Bank review you’re reading, real or fake? We analyzed the rates of AI reviews in Canadian online banking from 2018 to 2025 to find out!

Trusted By Industry Leaders
Trusted By Industry Leaders

In recent years, the financial services landscape has undergone a profound transformation driven by advances in artificial intelligence (AI). 

From algorithmic trading to customer service chatbots, the use cases for AI have continued to expand, and nowhere is that more visible than in the realm of online customer reviews. 

As major Canadian online banks strive to enhance their digital footprints and differentiate themselves in a competitive market, customer feedback has become a critical barometer of both brand reputation and service quality. 

Yet, the rise of sophisticated text-generation models raises an important question: to what extent are “customer” reviews genuinely the product of human experience, and how much are being authored or heavily edited by AI?

In this study, we investigated the prevalence of AI reviews for Canadian online banks — Simplii Financial, Tangerine, Wealthsimple, and PC Financial — from 2018 to 2025. 

Objectives of the Study

This study examines the prevalence of AI-generated reviews across four leading Canadian online banking platforms, Simplii Financial, Tangerine, Wealthsimple, and PC Financial, from 2018 to 2025. 

Leveraging our proprietary Originality.ai AI detection tool, we analyzed reviews to determine whether they were human-written or AI-generated. Then, we calculated annual rates of AI-authored content for each noted financial institution. 

Key Takeaways (TL;DR)

  • AI Canadian online bank reviews have increased by 4600% — 2018 to 2025.
  • In 2018, reviews were primarily human-written for each financial institution studied:
    • Tangerine had 99% human-written reviews (1% AI reviews). 
    • Simplii Financial, Wealthsimple, and PC Financial had 100% human-written reviews (0% AI reviews).
  • By 2025, Simplii Financial, Tangerine, Wealthsimple, and PC Financial all saw AI-authored review rates exceed 10%.
  • Averaging across all four banks, the mean AI review rate climbed from just 0.25% in 2018 to approximately 11.75% in 2025, representing a 4600% increase in AI reviews.

Interested in learning more about the impact of AI on the Canadian financial services sector? Read our analysis of AI Canadian “Big 5” bank reviews.

Key Takeaways

2018 to 2025: AI Canadian Online Bank Reviews Rose by 4600%

2018 to 2025: AI Canadian Online Bank Reviews Rose by 4600%

From 2018 to 2025, the prevalence of AI-generated reviews across these four Canadian online banks rose sharply. 

In 2018, reviews at the Canadian online banks studied were primarily human-written:

  • Tangerine had 99% human-written reviews
  • Simplii Financial, Wealthsimple, and PC Financial had 100% human-written reviews.

Only Tangerine registered a non-zero rate of AI reviews (1.0%) in 2018, while Simplii Financial, Wealthsimple, and PC Financial all began at 0.0% AI-generated reviews. 

As of 2025, AI review rates have notably increased

By 2025, each institution — Simplii Financial, Tangerine, Wealthsimple, and PC Financial —  saw its AI-authored review rate exceed 10%. 

Averaging across all four banks, the mean AI review rate:

  • Climbed from just 0.25% in 2018 to approximately 11.75% in 2025
  • Representing an overall increase of 4600% in AI reviews from 2018 to 2025.

Notably, there was a range of changes in AI levels across the institutions. Wealthsimple saw an early uptick in AI reviews around 2021, while Tangerine and Simplii Financial exhibited more gradual rate increases.

Bank-by-bank analysis demonstrated that:

  • Simplii Financial experienced the largest jump with its AI-generated review rate rising from 0% in 2018 to 14% in 2025. 
  • Tangerine then had a 10-point increase. Its AI review levels rose from 1% in 2018 to 11% in 2025.
  • Wealthsimple and PC Financial saw identical 11.0-point gains, increasing from 0% AI reviews in 2018 to 11% AI reviews in 2025.

This range of changes suggests that, although all of the studied Canadian online banks have been affected by the surge in synthetic content, certain banks (such as Simplii Financial) have encountered a higher influx of AI-authored feedback.

11.8% of Canadian Online Bank Reviews Were Likely AI in 2025

11.8% of Canadian Online Bank Reviews Were Likely AI in 2025

Early in the period studied (2018), AI-authored content was low or zero, prior to the launch of mainstream AI tools like ChatGPT (in 2022).

However, by 2025, there was a marked increase in AI-generated review rates to an average of almost 12%

This signals a clear shift in the dynamics of online customer feedback for Canadian digital banks.

How Does This Impact Consumers?

How Does This Impact Consumers?

These findings underscore a broader industry trend: as text-generation tools have matured, AI-generated reviews have proliferated on financial services platforms. 

Canadian online banks now contend with more than one in ten reviews being flagged as AI-authored, a stark contrast to the near-absence of synthetic reviews 

For banks, this trajectory highlights the urgent need to bolster review-moderation protocols, incorporate AI detection, and educate customers about the distinction between genuine and AI-assisted feedback.

From a consumer-trust perspective, the rising prevalence of AI-generated reviews presents a two-fold challenge. 

First, genuine customers may find it increasingly difficult to differentiate between authentic experiences and AI-crafted testimonials (especially considering studies have shown humans struggle to identify AI), potentially undermining confidence in both the review ecosystem and the institution. 

Second, banks may be met with reviews that do not correspond to actual service improvements, skewing their internal performance metrics and strategic decision-making. 

To mitigate these risks, financial institutions should transparently disclose their review-moderation practices and incorporate AI detection.

Final Thoughts

Our analysis of AI-generated review rates across four major Canadian online banks reveals a pronounced industry-wide escalation of synthetic feedback. 

As of 2025, more than one in ten Canadian online bank reviews is flagged as AI-authored, with individual institutions’ AI review levels ranging from approximately 11% to 14%. 

These findings highlight the urgent need for banks to strengthen AI detection frameworks and communicate clearly with customers about review integrity.

Ultimately, maintaining trust in online reviews will require an ongoing commitment to AI-detection strategies and transparent engagement with all stakeholders in the digital feedback ecosystem.

Wondering whether a post or review you’re reading might be AI-generated? Use the Originality.ai AI detector to find out.

Read more about the impact of AI:

Methodology

This study analyzed AI-generated customer reviews among Canada's main online banks — Wealthsimple, Simplii Financial, Tangerine, and PC Financial — using web scraping and AI detection tools.

Customer reviews were collected using Python scripts with BeautifulSoup and Requests libraries from platforms like ConsumerAffairs and Trustpilot. The data, including review content and dates, was saved in CSV format.

Reviews with 50+ words were analyzed using the Originality.ai API. An automated script sent review data for analysis, returning AI likelihood scores and binary classifications (AI or human). The script included error handling and retry features for reliability.

Results, including dates, bank names, review texts, and AI scores, were logged and saved periodically. Final datasets were compiled into CSV files for trend analysis from 2018 to 2025.

This method ensured reliable identification of AI-generated reviews, supporting a deeper analysis of trends in Canadian online banking.

Madeleine Lambert

Madeleine Lambert

Madeleine Lambert is the Director of Marketing and Sales at Originality.ai, with over a decade of experience in SEO and content creation. She previously owned and operated a successful content marketing agency, which she scaled and exited. Madeleine specializes in digital PR—contact her for media inquiries and story collaborations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I have to fill out the entire form?

No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.

Why is the English so poor for some prompts?

When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.

In The Press

Originality.ai has been featured for its accurate ability to detect GPT-3, Chat GPT and GPT-4 generated content. See some of the coverage below…

View All Press
Featured by Leading Publications

Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.

Vahan Petrosyan

searchenginejournal.com

I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.

Tom Demers

searchengineland.com

After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.

Rock Content Team

rockcontent.com

Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.

Felix Rose-Collins

ranktracker.com

ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai

Ashley Stahl

forbes.com

Originality.ai Do give them a shot! 

Sri Krishna

venturebeat.com

For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.

Industry Trends

analyticsinsight.net

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is it important to check for plagiarism?

Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.

What is Text Comparison?

Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.

How do Text Comparison Tools Work?

Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.

String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.

The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.

Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.

String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.

What is Syntax Highlighting?

Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.

The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.

How Can I Conduct a Plagiarism Check between Two Documents Online?

With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.

What Are the Benefits of Using a Text Compare Tool?

Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.

What Files Can You Inspect with This Text Compare Tool?

We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.

Will My Data Be Shared?

There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.

Software License Agreement

Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai

All rights reserved.

Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:

  1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.

  1. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.

THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

Will My Data Be Shared?

This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!

More From The Blog

Al Content Detector & Plagiarism Checker for Marketers and Writers

Use our leading tools to ensure you can hit publish with integrity!