Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
2023 was a year completely dominated by news headlines about generative AI (artificial intelligence). Synonymous with any mention of Generative AI or artificial intelligence is an application called ChatGPT. ChatGPT is a chatbot application that uses a GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) large language model to interact with end users in a conversational way.
Although less commonly known, ChatGPT was developed as an offshoot and sibling model to InstructGPT. The model and Chatbot were both developed by a San Francisco-based tech company called OpenAI.
ChatGPT, among other Generative AI applications, has exploded in popularity and use since the onset of 2023 when ChatGPT was first released. According to our internal research (Source), AI use in the creation of review articles has steadily grown at a rapid pace since 2018. Similarly, Statista (Source) survey studies indicate that client facing businesses are similarly riding the wave of AI applications, using the technology to cut costs, raise productivity, and reduce overhead.
Look below to delve into the descriptive statistics surrounding the current state of ChatGPT and how it has fared with regards to market adoption, technical capabilities, customer demographics, and much more.
(Source)
Since the founding of OpenAI, the development team for ChatGPT have consistently rolled out improvements of the GPT model and the ensuing chatbot. The following below is a chronological look at the major milestones that has led to the current state of ChatGPT today:
The following graphic below is provided by OpenAI and details the process behind making an LLM (large language model) like ChatGPT functional.
(Source)
As highlighted throughout this article, ChatGPT has proven to be acutely capable of a wide ranging set of tasks. Instead of listing the endless possibilities for ChatGPT’s applications, here is a list of uses that OpenAI has forbade ChatGPT from providing answers to (Source):
The following Image below, displays the results of a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center to determine how aware Americans are of ChatGPT:
achers are activ
(Source)
Aside from the sentiment towards ChatGPT, the performance of ChatGPT on common examinations are similarly impressive:
(Source)
The following graphic below explains and displays recent political biases uncovered in responses provided by ChatGPT:
(Source)
With newer AI advancements being implemented, it can become increasingly challenging for AI detection tools to recognize generative content. ChatGPT’s technology is constantly evolving, requiring AI detectors to remain competitive.
ChatGPT can be extremely effective for research, content creation, and general suggestions. However, it should not be relied on as the sole source of information. While it’s useful in many aspects, ChatGPT may not always provide the most accurate, human-sounding, or precise information that your audience is looking for.
In this context, we tested ChatGPT and Originality.ai’s AI detection tool. We incorporated different prompts and methods to determine the efficacy of Originality.ai’s AI detector at identifying ChatGPT’s AI content. Let’s review the test results!
When generating ChatGPT content with standard prompts, the expectation that the tool will attempt to conceal the AI content is low.
For example, starting your message to ChatGPT with “generate an article on (topic)” and not adding any extra instructions will request the most standard AI article from ChatGPT, recognizable by many AI detection technologies on the web.
[Prompt #1] - Generate a short article (500-1000 words) on 2024 fashion trends.
In the first test, we will be generating a standard information piece without extra instructions on our end.
Let’s have a look at ChatGPT’s concealment attempt to avoid being detected:
We’ve received an 894-word output from ChatGPT’s standard version. The result from Originailty’s detection is evident. It detected the content as likely AI with 100% confidence. Let’s proceed with the next prompt and determine how Originality.ai continues to perform:
[Prompt #2] - Generate a short article (500-1000 words) on 2024 tech & gadget trends.
We’ve decided to narrow ChatGPT’s scope towards 2024 tech and gadgets, a widely popular niche.
Let’s look at the results:
Once again, we’re faced with a strong outcome. From the output of 1,043 words, Originality.ai has detected likely AI-generated content with 100% confidence. It is evident that regardless of the topic, the Originality.ai AI detector can easily recognize ChatGPT-generated content.
Now, let’s move on to more complicated tests where we give ChatGPT additional instructions about making the articles sound more “human.”
To really put ChatGPT to the test, we must involve additional instructions to humanize the output as much as possible. Telling ChatGPT to “humanize the article” or “make it non-detectable by AI tools” doesn’t have much of an impact in most cases. So, when creating the prompt, we added additional instructions in terms of outline, writing style, and the approximate audience that will view the text.
[Prompt #1] - Generate a short article (500-1000 words) on 2024 fashion trends. Informatively split each heading in the article, consisting of 2-3 paragraphs. Make the content sound as human as possible by keeping a direct and natural tone with the reader. Our audience consists of both young and middle-aged people interested in recent fashion trends.
Keep in mind that providing ChatGPT with formatting, writing, and image examples helps produce content that’s even more accurate. Let’s put the result from the above prompt to the test:
Even with the additional instructions, Originality.ai has detected the content as likely AI with 100% confidence from the 904 words generated from ChatGPT, demonstrating that there isn’t an easy way to bypass the AI detection tools.
In the next prompt, we’ll provide ChatGPT with a human-written example before generating a new article. This should provide it with ideas on how to produce human-written content.
[Prompt #2] - Generate a short article (500-1000 words) on 2024 tech & gadgets. Informatively split each heading in the article, consisting of 2-3 paragraphs. Make the content sound as human as possible by keeping a direct and natural tone with the reader. Our audience consists of both young and middle-aged people interested in recent fashion trends. Use this article - [Provided Text] for example.
Unexpectedly, we’ve received two individual responses from ChatGPT, each containing information on 2024 technology and gadgets. We have been prompted to select only each of the responses, so we weren’t able to compare both outputs.
This solidifies the testing — the AI detector was 100% confident the copy was likely AI. The response of the prompt was 752 words in length.
In conclusion, Originality.ai continuously demonstrated that it could detect ChatGPT content even after providing ChatPT with a fully human-written article as an example.
According to recent research conducted in August and September 2024, here’s how ChatGPT’s traffic and reach stats are performing (Source):
ChatGPT shows its market presence and dominance as the site reaches roughly 78.18% of users through direct searches, the chart below shows how many users ChatGPT reaches through other web traffic sources:
Similarly, this next graph illustrates the traffic driven to ChatGPT by different social media channels (Source):
As of August and September 2024 (current data), the most common ChatGPT user can be described by the stats below;
Not long ago, artificial intelligence as a term was confined to the realm of science fiction and the spirited discussions of a select group of the world’s most talented scientists. Inversely, by looking at the data above, it’s clear to see that ChatGPT was in full control of the news cycle throughout 2023.
Moreover, the application has cemented itself not only in tech circles but also become a mainstay in the lexicon of most businesses and consumers around the world. In the meantime, AI chatbots like ChatGPT and its competitors have shifted the way in which customers interact with businesses, how businesses market themselves to target customers, and how teams disseminate information internally.
Nonetheless, if ChatGPT can build on its progress from 2023, the advancements to come will continue to revolutionize how we interact with large language models.
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
Save up to 23% on our Pro and Enterprise subscriptions
See Our Pricing