Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
Throughout 2023, one professional field that has exploded in relevance and burst onto everybody’s screens is that of Artificial intelligence (AI). Although much of this attention has been centred on OpenAI and ChatGPT, a derivative large language model (LLM) named Claude AI has drawn serious interest from investors and enthusiasts alike.
The pioneering firm behind Claude is a San Francisco-based startup named Anthropic, which opened its doors in early 2021. So far, Anthropic’s call to fame has been its focus and relentless dedication to developing reliable AI systems that lead the industry in responsibility and safety.
Moreover, Anthropic has published insightful research uncovering the potential impacts of AI on the world and shedding light on any underlying risks and opportunities that come with leveraging the technology.
It is important to note that above all else, Anthropic virtuously commits itself further than the technological innovation typically expected of tech companies, instead setting safety as their success metric. They strive to build AI systems that are honest, helpful, and harmless.
This unique approach has allowed Anthropic to build a systematic pipeline wherein the firm carries out experimental research, applies any findings to its AI offerings, and crowdsources valuable insights from the global community. This community response, in turn, further strengthens the applicability of its AI suite and aligns stakeholders (researchers, data scientists, engineers, policy analysts, etc.).
Read on below to learn more about the statistics which provide more insight and context on Anthropic AI.
Even though Anthropic is a relatively young company, it has a rich and interesting history. Most notably, the company was created and is currently headed by AI’s most alluring sibling duo of Dario and Daniela Amodei. The pair, along with other OpenAI alumni, founded Anthropic after not being satisfied with OpenAI’s strategic direction back in 2021. The following milestones show the up to date progression of the budding AI outfit:
Aside from the technical developments made with Claude AI, the following milestones below indicate the progress made by Anthropic as an AI firm:
Source: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3127764
On June 21, 2024, Anthropic announces its first AI model release in the new Claude 3.5 family. Praised to “raise the bar” of the AI industry and “elevate” generative AI like never before, the Claude 3.5 Sonnet may outperform many competitors with up to a 200K token context window.
The model is now available for free on “Claude.ai” or through the Claude iOS application. Paid users can also access the model via “Claude Pro” and “Team” plans, which offer higher limits on rates.
The model is also available through Anthropic’s API, Google Cloud’s Vertex AI, or Amazon Bedrock.
(Source)
Here’s a detailed overview of the AI model’s specifications:
You can now submit feedback on Claude 3.5’s performance directly to Anthropic in-product to shape the “development roadmap” of the model and help to improve your user experience. (Source)
As an AI darling with a team full of silicon valley pedigree, Anthropic has been largely successful in converting investor interest into large seed investments. The following of which are detailed below:
The following data points paint a general picture of the current financial outlook of Anthropic provide a look into the company’s future prospects:
Owned by Anthropic, Claude is a next-gen generative AI tool, with the capability to understand and answer in a human-like language, making it an ideal chatbot for most users. While most compare it to ChatGPT, Claude excels in refined human responses.
To accurately determine Claude’s effectiveness, we’ll be testing it against Originality.ai’s AI detection tool. We’ll test Claude with a variety of prompts, each aiming to extract the most human output possible.
We will be using Originality.ai to test Claude and the most recent version of the AI chatbot, Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
So, let’s begin with the first tests and uncover how effective Claude is at concealing AI-generated content!
Let’s start with a simple long-form article to test the Originality.ai AI Detector. During the first tests, we’ll analyze how good Claude is at generating proper human-sounding content, with no extra instructions towards structure and refinement included.
[Prompt #1] - Write a short article (500-1000 words) on the expansion of 5G networks in 2024.
From the 558 words we’ve scanned and compared with Originality.ai, the results are solid:
Claude was not able to conceal the content. The Originality.ai AI detector identifies the content as likely AI with 100% confidence.
For the second prompt, we’ll include extra instructions to make the text sound as unique as possible.
[Prompt #2] - Write a short article (500-1000 words) on the expansion of 5G networks in 2024. Stick to the conventional tone of a human conversation and make the text sound as unique as possible. Refrain from using “robotic” phrases and sentences.
We’ve received a 646-word output from Claude 3.5 Sonnet and run it through Originality.ai’s AI detector. Let’s see the results from the second prompt:
Once again, Originality.ai shows a strong performance with 100% confidence the text is likely AI.
Now, let’s proceed with the second stage of text prompts and provide Claude with a human-written article example to extract ideas and humanize the content as much as possible.
We’ll use identical prompts as with the first two tests but provide Claude with a unique human-written article example that hasn’t been published on the web. This will determine whether the bot can adapt to new writing ideas. Then, we’ll run it through Originality.ai’s AI Detector to see if it can bypass AI detection systems.
[Prompt #1] - Write a short article (500-1000 words) on the expansion of 5G networks in 2024. Use this *article* as an example to style and structure the new piece.
Let’s compare the new output from Claude in Originality.ai:
This time, we received a 619-word article that followed the style of the example we’ve provided. However, despite additional instructions, Originality.ai continues to show excellent capabilities, detecting the content as likely AI with 100% confidence.
Now, let’s provide Claude with an article example and the additional instructions from the second prompt during the previous tests to determine if there’s an improvement.
[Prompt #2] - Write a short article (500-1000 words) on the expansion of 5G networks in 2024. Stick to the conventional tone of a human conversation and make the text sound as unique as possible. Refrain from using “robotic” phrases and sentences. Use this *article* as an example to style and structure the new piece.
Here are the results from the 719 words we’ve scanned:
Once again, Originality.ai performed exceptionally and recognized the final piece as likely AI-generated with 100% confidence. Even with the latest improvements, Originality.ai continued to detect text generated by Claude 3.5 Sonnet!
Alongside it AI model Claude AI [www.claude.ai], anthropic.com has drawn much interest from the global tech community, currently the site has achieved (Source):
Traffic by Source (Source)
Social Media (Source)
Using data from September 2024 (latest available data), the following data below depicts characteristics of the most frequent anthropic.com visitor;
Gender (Source)
Age (Source)
The median age of Anthropic AI visitors is 25- 34 years old.
Location (Source):
Here are which countries visit Anthropic.com the most according to a recent report in September 2024:
Considering their strong 2023 where all traffic metrics and consumer interest are trajecting upwards, Anthropic is poised to have a seminal 2024. By retaining its focus on producing the most helpful, honest, and harmless AI solution on the market, Anthropic will surely differentiate itself from competitors like ChatGPT or Google Bard. Along with its strong backing through equity-backed partnerships with technological giants Amazon and SAP, Anthropic has impressed with stark improvements in the technical capabilities of its AI model, Claude. This is all to say that what lies ahead for Anthropic in the coming year will certainly continue to transform the state of AI and keep the rest of the industry on its toes.
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!