Try the Most Accurate AI Detector on the Market
Our patented AI checker is the most accurate detector on the market! Don't believe us? Try it for yourself!
Try for FREE Here!
AI Studies

From 2019 to 2024: AI-Generated Google Reviews Increased by 279.2%

We studied the presence of AI in Google Reviews from 2019 to 2024 to analyze its impact for consumers and businesses. These are our findings.

The importance of Google Reviews cannot be overstated.

Sure, brands may tell you that they are the best at what they do, as it’s their job to convince you that is the case.

One way to check whether or not that was true — whether a particular brand really was the best — was to look at Google reviews.

After all, who is better placed to tell you whether or not a brand meets expectations than a fellow consumer?

That said, the rise of AI-generated content has brought online reviews into question. We are all aware that AI-generated reviews exist, but to what extent?

In this study, we aim to identify the true impact of AI-generated content in the context of Google reviews to help businesses and consumers better understand what they are reading online.

Objectives of the Study

  • Considering that we’ve already seen the impact of AI on Airline reviews, holiday shopping reviews, and even Google search results, we wanted to study it in the context of Google Reviews. 
  • Further, we wanted to shed light on whether there would be a similar rise in AI-generated content in Google reviews, just as we’ve seen in the previously mentioned studies.
  • If there was a rise we wanted to evaluate how much that rise was and how it tracked from 2019 to 2024. 

Overall, our analysis aims to discuss what the effects could be for consumers and businesses and what people should do to help counteract the rise in generated content.

Key Takeaways (TL;DR)

  • From 2019 to 2024, the proportion of AI-generated reviews on Google grew by a whopping 279.2%.
  • AI-generated reviews nearly doubled from 12.21% in 2023 to 19% in 2024.
  • That means nearly one in five Google reviews were AI-generated last year alone.
Key Takeaways (TL;DR)

19% of Google Reviews in 2024 Were Likely AI

19% of Google Reviews in 2024 Were Likely AI

The pie chart above reveals a clear division between AI-generated and human-generated Google reviews in 2024. 

Notably, 19% of the reviews were identified as AI-generated, while the majority, 81%, were created by humans

This distribution highlights that while AI is playing an increasingly prominent role in content generation, it remains secondary to human authorship, at least for now.

Yet, the fact that nearly a quarter of the reviews are AI-generated is significant and signals the growing integration of AI tools in digital content

Businesses might be leveraging AI to streamline review generation, fill gaps in feedback, or create a more robust online presence.

Further, the presence of 19% of reviews as AI also raises important ethical and practical questions

If used irresponsibly, AI-generated reviews could mislead consumers and harm brand trust. Businesses may face scrutiny from platforms and consumers if the use of AI in reviews becomes too prominent or is perceived as deceptive. 

The appearance of any AI-generated content suggests that monitoring and regulation, such as through AI detection, may be needed to ensure transparency and maintain consumer trust.

While AI in Google Reviews is rising, humans still contribute the majority of reviews

The fact that 81% of reviews in 2024 were human-generated reviews indicates a continued reliance on organic feedback.

This is likely driven by the perceived authenticity and relatability of human-written reviews. 

It suggests that consumers are still actively contributing their own reviews and are more likely to trust or engage with content that reflects genuine human experiences and emotions.

However, this could change in future, as AI becomes increasingly integrated into everyday life.

2019 to 2024 Saw a 279.2% Increase in AI Google Reviews 

2019 to 2024 Saw a 279.2% Increase in AI Google Reviews 

The data reveals a sharp increase in the rate of AI-generated reviews between 2019 and the end of 2024. In 2019, the AI-generated review rate stood at 5.01%

By the end of 2024, this rate had climbed dramatically to 19%.

This reflects a 279.2% increase from 2019 to 2024

The substantial growth of Google reviews that are Likely AI highlights:

  • The increasing integration of AI technologies into the review ecosystem.
  • The rise in the proportion of AI-generated reviews, alongside a growing total number of reviews, suggests that AI content is becoming a dominant force in online feedback. 

The significant jump in the rate from 12.21% in 2023 to 19% by the end of 2024 may indicate a tipping point where AI-generated reviews are no longer a marginal phenomenon but a mainstream element of review platforms. 

This underscores the importance of understanding the implications of AI-generated content for both consumers and businesses.

What The Rise in AI-Generated Google Reviews Means for Consumers and Businesses

For businesses, the increase in AI review rates presents both opportunities and risks

  • On the one hand, AI-generated reviews can enhance engagement by providing structured and consistent feedback. 
  • On the other hand, the potential misuse of AI to generate fake or misleading reviews poses a significant threat to consumer trust. 

Platforms must invest in advanced AI detection tools and transparent policies to address these challenges and maintain credibility.

From a consumer perspective, the growing prevalence of AI-generated reviews may create uncertainty around the authenticity of feedback

If consumers lose confidence in the reliability of reviews, it could impact purchasing decisions and the perceived value of online feedback systems.

Final Thoughts on AI-Generated Google Reviews

In conclusion, the rapid rise in AI-generated review rates from 5.01% in 2019 to 19% by the end of 2024 signals a profound transformation in the digital review landscape. 

While 19% of AI-generated reviews showcase the potential of AI in augmenting digital interactions, the dominance of human-written content at 81% underlines the enduring importance of authenticity. 

Businesses should carefully balance efficiency gains from AI tools with the necessity of fostering genuine consumer trust to succeed in the competitive online marketplace.

As this trend continues, businesses and platforms must prioritize transparency, authenticity, and trust to navigate the evolving challenges and opportunities presented by AI-generated content.

Not sure if a review you’re reading is human-written or AI-generated? Use the best-in-class Originality.ai AI Checker to find out.

Methodology

1. Defining the Search Scope

1.1 Geographic Locations
The study targets the 15 most populous North American cities, using their names and geospatial coordinates to ensure search results focus within city boundaries.

1.2 Categories
Twenty predefined categories (e.g., “hospital,” “pharmacy,” “restaurant”) were selected to capture reviews from various public, commercial, and cultural establishments.

2. Data Collection via Google Places API

2.1 Place Discovery
Using the Google Places Text Search API, queries for each city-category pair include:

  • query: Category name (e.g., “hospital”)
  • location: City latitude and longitude
  • radius: 15,000 meters
  • key: Google API key

Paginated results are retrieved systematically by handling next_page_token responses.

2.2 Review Retrieval
Place details and reviews are extracted via the Google Places Details API. Each request specifies:

  • place_id: Unique establishment identifier
  • fields: Required fields (e.g., name, reviews)
  • key: Google API key

The API returns up to five reviews per place, including text, rating, and timestamp, converted to a readable format.

3. Data Management

3.1 Structuring Data
Reviews are stored as dictionaries containing establishment name, review text, rating, review date, and city name, ensuring consistency for analysis.

3.2 Incremental Saving
Data is saved to a CSV file after every 500 reviews to minimize memory usage and protect against data loss. Header rows and progress tracking ensure seamless recovery in case of interruptions.

3.3 Final Dataset
Remaining reviews are saved after processing all city-category combinations, ensuring a comprehensive dataset.

4. Considerations and Limitations

  • API Constraints: Only up to five reviews per place are retrieved.
  • Rate Limits: Delays (2 seconds) are added for paginated results to comply with API policies.
  • Geographical Precision: A 15,000-meter radius may include areas outside city centers.
  • Data Quality: Reviews are user-generated and may require cleaning to remove spam or irrelevant content.
Madeleine Lambert

Madeleine Lambert

Madeleine Lambert is the Director of Marketing and Sales at Originality.ai, with over a decade of experience in SEO and content creation. She previously owned and operated a successful content marketing agency, which she scaled and exited. Madeleine specializes in digital PR—contact her for media inquiries and story collaborations.

More From The Blog

Al Content Detector & Plagiarism Checker for Marketers and Writers

Use our leading tools to ensure you can hit publish with integrity!