Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
The Raygor graph was created by Alton L. Raygor in 1977. He was greatly inspired by the Fry Readability Formula. He, therefore, created Raygor to work as a similar calculation. There was a key difference, though. The Fry graph uses syllables as its main feature and Raygor uses letter counting as its main feature.
Alton Raygor considered words that had six or more letters in them as difficult. He felt that it took a lot of time to count syllables rather than letters. Syllables, he thought, could be misinterpreted. While the Fry graph is still used widely used. Raygor’s Readability Graph is highly accurate and popular too.
A readability score estimates the reading difficulty of texts by providing the level of readability for them. Maybe you don’t know much about what a readability index is and what it measures. Check it out here – see how it is explained.
The main difference between the two is their different features of measurement. The Fry Graph uses syllable counting. The Raygor Graph uses letter counting. Alton Raygor wanted to use letter counting because he felt it takes less time than syllable counting and found that letter counting offered more accurate results.
Another reading test that is similar to the Raygor Readability Test is the Automated Readability Test.
o Take a 100-word sample passage that you want to test.
o Then count up the number of sentences that there are in the passage. Plot the answer you get on the graph.
o Then count the number of words in the passage that consists of more than six letters. In other words, count the more difficult, longer words. You will also plot the answer on the graph.
o You will get your result on the Raygor graph. It will be at the place where the two points meet. Look, here is an example to show you. This will help you to see the estimated reading level needed for a person to understand the text.
o The numbers of words having six or more characters are plotted on the horizontal axis (x-axis). The number of sentences per 100 words will be plotted on the vertical axis (y-axis).
Today, we have Readable to refer to. Should you use Raygor with Readable, you don't need to assess a plot point on a graph. The text will get analyzed and converted to a level of difficulty instantly.
Back in Raygor's day, there weren’t a whole lot of computers that were widely available to the public. That’s why Raygor’s method of calculating readability levels is accessible and fast. It could be calculated quickly on paper.
Today, with modern computing, we are given the opportunity to compute the above index for quite a few 100-word samples! We can get results for an entire text almost immediately.
It is mostly used for educational purposes. This is because it is able to assess the difficulty level of text right up to the university level for college-level readers. The Raygor Readability Test doesn’t go below the 3rd grade, though. In fact, a Raygor estimate is more suited for middle school English language skills estimates.
Readability levels are important in middle school because it is at this time when a child will either be keen to read in the future or not. Books that kids read at difficult reading levels can’t be too difficult to understand and this can bore them, which will then make reading feel “forced” to them.
Librarians, teachers, and parents need to ensure that they give kids the right reading materials for their education level so that it is fun and engaging for the child. Even beyond middle school, when you implement the same thing as kids get older, you are ensuring that they stay eager and willing to continue reading.
Improving your score on the Raygor Readability Graph is quite simple. The most important thing to remember is to write simply. Use shorter, less complex sentences. That way, you don’t confuse your readers and you will be conveying clear messages to them. When you use simpler words, you improve your score.
You can maximize modern technology using the Raygor readability calculator. This will edit your text and make it 100% correct for you.
Both Alton Raygor and Edward Fry were two men who wanted to make reading text an easier thing to do. To do this, each man developed their reading index. The Raygor Graph is one such readability metric for English text.
The grade-level score of a U.S. text is calculated by the number of sentences and letters and the averages received get plotted onto a graph. The point where the number of sentences and the number of words intersects is the reading level of the text.
The Raygor graph is mainly used in secondary education. Today, the Raygor Readability Graph has proven hugely helpful in classifying teaching materials and books into the correct reading groups and determining average literacy levels.
Here is a list of all readability tests.
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
Get insight into the reading age of political speeches. Find out which candidates use the lowest reading age, which ones alter the reading age based on where their speech is, and how political speeches have changed in recent times.
Save up to 23% on our Pro and Enterprise subscriptions
See Our Pricing