Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
Welcome to an exploration of HuggingChat, an open-source AI chatbot reshaping the landscape of conversational AI. We embark on this journey to uncover the intricacies of HuggingChat, offering a compelling alternative to ChatGPT.
As we begin our journey, we examine HuggingChat's top highlights, including its outstanding 65 billion parameters, This article provides a detailed overview of HuggingChat's capabilities, and then a closer look at its architecture and special features.
Hugging Face has emerged as the visionary force behind HuggingChat, with a mission to democratize AI. The ethos of this innovative project is based on their dedication to transparency and accessibility, which gives further context to HuggingChat's story of emergence in the ever-changing AI field.
Our investigation goes a step further and pits HuggingChat against its artificial intelligence competitors. Our objective is to present a comprehensive analysis of HuggingChat's capabilities and efficacy by contrasting and comparing it with other top chatbots.
HuggingChat has 65 billion parameters and is at the moment the best an open-source chat model according to Hugging Face (Source and Source).
➤ Green = Correctly Identified the Content as AI or Original.
➤ Yellow = Uncertain.
➤ Red = Incorrectly Identified the Content as AI or Original (Source).
In this section, we’ll generate multiple texts to analyze how well Originality.ai detects HuggingChat text. Additionally, we’ll add extra instructions for HuggingChat to use a human-written example as an outline.
While HuggingChat, along with many AI generation tools, is helpful when it comes to research and ideation, it’s best practice to publish human-written articles.
Not only can AI detectors like Originality.ai identify the text as AI-generated, but AI tends to produce generic content. As a result, Google prioritizes helpful human-written blog posts.
Let’s review a series of tests based on different prompts to evaluate the efficacy of Originality.ai at detecting HuggingChat AI content!
In the first series of tests, we’ll determine just how well the current version of HuggingChat can conceal AI-generated content without extra instructions. For the continuity of the testing, we’ll use HuggingChat and the Originality.ai AI Detector.
[Prompt #1] - Generate a 1000-word article on sustainable technology trends throughout 2024. Make the text sound as human as possible and forget the language rules used by most generative AI tools.
From our prompt, we’ve received a 1,196-word article, even after telling HuggingChat to keep the text within 1,000 words. Here are the detection results with little to no extra instructions:
As is evident from the results, the Originality.ai AI Checker has detected that the content is Likely AI with 100% confidence.
Let’s move on with the second prompt!
[Prompt #2] - Generate an 800-1000 word article on sustainable technology trends throughout 2024. Make the text sound as human as possible and forget the language rules that are used by most generative AI tools. Do not adhere to standard writing techniques and implement the suddenness and fluidity of human dialogue. Imagine you own a company that’s inventing sustainable technology and add first-person speech sections in the text. Break up the paragraphs with bullets and a numbered list.
In the second prompt, we aimed to prompt HuggingChat to generate an output that sounded similar to the CEO of a sustainable technology company. Further, we specified the importance of making the text sound as human as possible. Let’s see Originality.ai’s detection results:
Here we’ve received an output that’s 650 words. Once again, Originality.ai demonstrated strong performance with 100% Confidence that the text was Likely AI.
Providing fully human-written examples to generative AI tools can have a significant impact on the flow, context, and content within AI-generated text. So, we’ve provided HuggingChat with a 1,000-word article example in the technology sector and told it to stick with the article’s flow and sentencing.
[Prompt #1] - Generate a 1000-word article on sustainable technology trends throughout 2024. Make the text sound as humanly as possible and forget the language rules used by most generative AI tools. Follow the structuring, context, and sense of this example: (article).
Even at first glance, it is evident that there’s an improvement in how the text sounds and reads. HuggingChat has extracted ideas to make the text sound less formal. Let’s analyze the detection results:
The text was 809 words in length, and Originality.ai’s AI Checker reports that the copy is Likely AI with 99% confidence.
The next step is to provide HuggingChat with all of the extra instructions from the previous prompts and provide the article example to see if it alters the detection outcome.
[Prompt #2] - Generate an 800-1000 word article on sustainable technology trends throughout 2024. Make the article sound as human as possible and forget the language rules used by most generative AI tools. Avoid standard writing techniques and implement a human dialogue’s suddenness and fluidity. Imagine you’re the CEO of a company about sustainable technology and add first-person speech sections in the text. Break up the paragraphs with bullets and a numbered list. Use this article as an example for your writing: (example). Do not use any of the example’s ideas and only adhere to the structuring and style of pronunciation.
Once again, even with a human-written example to learn from, Originality.ai’s AI Checker identified the text as Likely AI with 100% Confidence.
Overall, these tests continue to demonstrate the exceptional accuracy and performance of Originality.ai in detecting AI-generated content.
i
cating serious and graphic claims about events on specific dates.In several aspects, HuggingChat bears a strong resemblance to ChatGPT and can perform with comparable effectiveness and precision. For instance, the user interface of Chat GPT closely mirrors that of HuggingChat (Source).
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
Socratic is best known as Google’s free AI-powered learning app that connects students with online resources. Learn about the history of Socratic, from its early development to its acquisition by Google. Plus, get insight into key statistics like traffic sources and financials.
Save up to 23% on our Pro and Enterprise subscriptions
See Our Pricing