Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
Oftentimes, people will ask “how many words in a row is plagiarism?” You’ll often hear that “five consecutive words” is the standard, although there’s no hard and fast rule that says “but four words is fine.” In terms of use, it’s a gray area because you can still paraphrase another person’s work without actually using their words and have it considered plagiarism.
If a writer is producing content, and suddenly there’s a quote that doesn’t exactly fit the narrative or style, but there’s no citation indicating that it could be from another person, it’s not only jarring to the reader, but it’s also suspicious. Online, it doesn’t take much in-depth research to find the same thoughts expressed in a different way, and it’s for that reason that a hard and fast rule like “five words” is really useless when considered as part of the overall structure of the content.
Plagiarism is complex and the focus is less on what was said and more about how and where it was taken from. In fact, one would argue that it takes longer to take someone else’s idea, put it into your own words, and share it than it does to simply copy their words and acknowledge them as the original author or creator.
This is a conundrum for writers of all types. In academia, it’s incredibly common to take someone else’s ideas and rewrite them using your own language rather than citing the original document (which may sound too scientific or technical) outright. At the same time, sometimes authors express their ideas so clearly and succinctly that you might think “there’s no way possible to rephrase this in a way that’s as good as, or better, than the original.”
Fortunately, The Yale Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning has some excellent strategies for accurately paraphrasing others’ works without crossing the line into plagiarism. Much of their suggestions center around leveraging someone else’s ideas and transforming them into language that’s more accessible to the modern reader. Oftentimes, when we talk about paraphrasing, we talk about general reordering and rewording of content to the point where it may not be an exact replica of the original, but it’s awfully close.
Proper paraphrasing is as much art as it is science and as such, the writer has to step into the shoes of the original author and consider the angle and situation that led them to create that content, and how it applies to the writer’s own version. Chances are, you won’t need such highly specific, detailed, or technical explanations but you can (and should) still cite the original author as the baseline for your research or argument. You are, after all, standing on the shoulders of giants and then lending your own thoughts and conjecture to a piece that makes it more uniquely your own.
Online, content creators love to share. You want as many eyes as possible on your content and you want people to feel free to share it on social networks and elsewhere on the web. The proliferation of content is what makes the sharing of ideas and resources and examples online so involved and worthwhile. We’re always learning something new and there’s always something interesting to share.
So how do you avoid plagiarism if you’re a blogger, content creator, or a marketing agency working with clients? The most common way for content producers to acknowledge the work of others is to quote them and link back to the original source. In cases where the work they’re citing is behind a landing page that requires an email address, it’s good netiquette to link to said landing page rather than link to the report directly. If it brings the reader a great deal of value, it’s only natural to share an email address for future updates or tips.
This is where things can get a little murky. What if you learned about a new development or interesting statistic through social media, but the data originally came from a news website? Which one do you cite? In this case, it’s good to not only acknowledge the blogger or influencer who shared the piece on social media (where you originally found it), but also the original source.
HubSpot demonstrates this on their own website through the following example:
HubSpot’s example citing a social media post originally taken from a news article
HubSpot also notes a special caveat in that same article, however, and that’s that sometimes, people don’t want their content shared. If that happens, at the very least they’ll notify you with a request to remove it. At the most, it could be their lawyer sending the demand. Should that happen, they note that it’s better to simply honor their request and find other relevant sources or expert quotes.
With all this concern as to how many words are or aren’t plagiarism, where does AI fit into the equation? It can be easy to think that if an AI chatbot like ChatGPT writes your content, you’re in the clear. But remember that ChatGPT is “learning” from the internet and other users. That means it’s being fed existing ideas; it’s not extrapolating anything on its own or making conjectures based on what it is being taught.
That’s where Originality.AI comes in. Designed to detect AI-written content with a high degree of accuracy, Originality works with even the most recent iteration of ChatGPT so you can be certain that the content you’re getting; whether you’re buying websites or working with writers and other content creators, is unique and authoritative.
With prices as low as 0.01 cent per credit (1 credit scans 100 words), you’ll save time and money as well as have a greater degree of confidence that the content you’re working with is authentically human. Try it now and see how much more intuitive and innovative today’s AI can be when it works to help you ensure maximum originality.
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
