Best AI Detector for Teachers: What to Look for & Top Picks
Looking for the best AI detector for teachers? Learn what features to look for and some of our top recommendations to help you narrow things down.
Trusted By Industry Leaders
Trusted By Industry Leaders
Finding the best AI detector for teachers has become a priority for those looking for a quick, reliable, and easy way to distinguish AI from student-written work.
Fortunately, we’ve got you covered.
Read on to learn what features to look for in an AI checker for the classroom and some of our top picks.
Key Takeaways (TL;DR)
- To find the best AI checker for teachers, you should consider accuracy, ease of use, integration capabilities, the quality of reports, data privacy and security, and affordability.
- Originality.ai is our top pick for the best AI detector for teachers because of its high accuracy rate and affordable, flexible pricing
- GPTZero is another popular option that integrates with classroom tools.
- Winston AI also offers helpful features for teachers like learning management system (LMS) integrations.
Get insight into why Originality.ai is the most accurate AI detector in our AI Content Detector Accuracy Review and AI Detection Accuracy Studies — Meta-Analysis.
What to Look for in an AI Checker for Teachers
Whether colleges are using AI detectors for research or applying them to student work, a few things make a good tool stand out.
Here’s what to look for in an AI detector for teachers:
- Accuracy. A good tool should be highly accurate with a low false positive rate. Additionally, it’s important to note that an AI detection or plagiarism detection score should not be used as the only measure to identify academic cheating.
- Ease of use. Teachers are busy! An AI checker for educators should be easy to use and understand without a huge learning curve.
- Integration capabilities. A nice-to-have, AI detectors with integrations are beneficial as they offer convenient AI detection functionalities for teachers.
- Learn about Originality.ai’s Chrome Extension.
- Comprehensive reports. Teachers need an AI detector that provides detailed reports, including AI detection confidence scores and highlights for AI-generated text.
- Data privacy and security. Educators should ensure that any content shared with a detection tool is safe and secure.
- Read about how Originality.ai treats your content.
- Affordability. Smaller schools and individual teachers have set budgets. In these cases, the best detection tool is the one that balances affordability with quality.
- Find out about Originality.ai’s flexible pricing.
Some may value an AI detection tool with a high accuracy rate above all else, while others prefer something that offers integrations for convenience. It’s all about finding the right tool that fits your preferences as an educator.
It’s a good thing there are some excellent options out there.
Our Top Picks for the Best AI Detector for Teachers
To help make your search easier, here are our choices for the best AI detection tools to use in the classroom.
1. Originality.ai
Best AI detector for teachers and educators
Originality.ai is our top pick for the best overall AI detector for teachers for: its accuracy, chrome extension integrations, and affordability. However, there’s even more to like about Originality.ai:
For teachers, Originality.ai features:
- A Lite AI detection model for educators with a 98% accuracy and <1% false positive rate
- Budget-friendly, pay-as-you-go pricing, plus the option to add additional educators to an account
- Comprehensive reports that show the tool’s overall confidence score in classifying the text as likely AI vs human written, and highlight the location of possible AI text
- End-to-end military grade 256-bit encryption for data security
- The flexibility to opt out of papers or articles being used for AI training
- A free AI Detector Chrome Extension so teachers can watch students write assignments from start to finish in Google Docs, helping them verify a student’s work
Teachers can get their originality AI detection results in just three steps:
- Enter text or paste text into the text box
- Ensure the “AI check” option is checked off
- Hit “Scan”
Done! After analyzing the text, Originality.ai provides an AI content detection score representing its confidence in its assessment and highlights the text accordingly.
So, if teachers are looking for a content detection tool that combines high accuracy with ease of use and budget-friendly pricing, Originality.ai is the overall best pick.
2. GPTZero
Popular AI detector with learning management system (LMS) integrations
GPTZero is next on our list, as it’s an AI detector used by colleges and universities for research.
GPTZero offers the following features for teachers:
- Downloadable reports breaking down the likelihood of AI vs human text in student work, and other classroom writing statistics
- Integration with (learning management systems) LMS and other classroom tools like Canvas and Moodle
- Video playback of student’s writing from start to finish
- A GPTZero AI Content Detector Chrome extension
As a result of these features, GPTZero is a top choice for teachers looking for an AI detector that integrates with their LMS and other classroom tools.
Interested in GPTZero’s accuracy? A third-party study conducted research on several AI detectors, including Originality.ai and GPTZero. Read a summary of the study results in an Empirical Study of AI-Generated Text Detection.
Then, check out our GPTZero review for additional insights.
3. Winston AI
AI detector with LMS integrations and plans for educators
It may count content marketers and writers among its client base, but Winston AI also offers AI content detection plans built with educators in mind.
Like the others on this list, Winston AI can detect AI-generated text from a range of generative AI models available to students, including ChatGPT and Gemini.
With Winston AI, teachers can enjoy the following features:
- Premium subscription plans for schools with seats for educators
- Optical Character Recognition (OCR) technology to extract text from images and document scans
- An overall confidence score providing a sentence-by-sentence assessment of the likelihood of AI vs human text
- Downloadable reports
Want to learn more about Winston AI’s efficacy and AI detection accuracy for other AI checkers as well? Multiple third-party studies conducted by researchers have evaluated Originality.ai, Winston AI, and other AI detectors. Check out the study summaries in a Meta-Analysis of AI Detection Accuracy Studies.
Then, check out our Winston AI review.
Final Thoughts
It may be only one of the ways that professors check for AI, but finding the best AI detector for teachers can play a key role in establishing transparency around AI in the classroom.
For the most accurate AI content detection for use by educators, try Originality.ai.
With the Lite model for educators, Originality.ai offers 98% accuracy and a false positive rate of under 1%. Originality.ai’s Lite model is excellent for teachers who want a better sense of AI use in their classrooms.
Read about which AI detection model is best for your use case.
Ready to get started? Sign up for Originality.ai today.
Further Reading:
Jess Sawyer
Frequently Asked Questions
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
In The Press
Originality.ai has been featured for its accurate ability to detect GPT-3, Chat GPT and GPT-4 generated content. See some of the coverage below…
View All PressFeatured by Leading Publications
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Frequently Asked Questions
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
- Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
- Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
