Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
/// Back in February a publisher very publicly bragged about mass publishing AI clickbait content in this Wired article. His sites have since been crushed by Google and most recently an account on Reddit that appears to be him complained about getting kicked off of his digital advertising providers platform MediaVine. ///
In response to Wired’s article, Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin, we’re taking an in-depth look into how a publisher of mass-produced AI clickbait content was impacted by both Google and MediaVine’s AI policies.
This expands on our previous analysis and live dashboard monitoring the overall rise of AI content in Google Search Results. As of August 2024, we found that 13.08% of the top 20 search results on Google contain AI content.
Further, in our study reviewing Google’s penalties for AI content, we found that the risk of Google penalizing sites as a result of publishing AI content was high. Approximately 30% of the sites analyzed in our study (which Google had deindexed) contained 95%+ AI-generated content.
Discover how the AI Clickbait Kingpin found out the negative impact of publishing spammy AI SEO content first hand. Then, review a series of AI detection scans from Originality.ai that uncover the presence of AI content in the AI Clickbait Kingpin’s publications.
At first, it seemed like the perfect business plan.
Buy abandoned websites with a dormant audience and churn out SEO-friendly content to rise through the rankings, leading to more clicks, improved ad revenue, and ultimately more profits.
Seems like the perfect plan, right?
Especially when you factor in how easy Google’s recent updates have made it to game the system, not to mention the advancements in generative AI allowing you to reduce expenditure and increase production even further.
Well, now that very business model has come crashing down, with AI clickbait kingpin Nebojša Vujinović Vujo watching his spammy SEO empire disappear in a matter of days thanks to recent Google updates and MediaVine bans.
While the concept of generative AI in SEO is still in its relevant infancy, Vujo’s SEO strategy formed many years back.
The process was simple. Look for websites that once had active and engaged audiences, such as The Frisky and The Hairpin, buy them from their owners, and flood them with SEO clickbait content.
The focus was no longer on quality content but rather on taking advantage of the years of authority the brand had accrued with consumers and search engines alike, and taking advantage of that by producing low-quality content that is designed to generate ad revenue, paid backlinks, and sponsored posts in what can only be described as an SEO cesspool.
The practice is known as domain squatting, and while deemed by many as “unethical” and “bottom of the barrel SEO”, the results cannot be ignored.
In fact, Vujo has gone on record to claim that he has made as much as $500,000 from just one website in a single year.
Not to mention the incredibly low overheads, as Vujo relied heavily on writers from the gig economy, often leaning on talent from platforms like Fiverr.
Those overhead costs became even lower when Vujo decided to cut 90% of his editorial staff, relying solely on AI-generated content.
You’d be forgiven for thinking that Vujo would be a big fan of a tool that could help him cut costs so significantly, but that isn’t actually the case.
Vujo sees the introduction of LLM’s as similar to that of commercially viable cars.
“I hate cars. They’re making my planet bad. But I’m not riding a horse anymore, right? I’m driving a car.”
Despite this viewpoint on the concept of AI, how much it has been used across his sites cannot be ignored.
In fact, of the first four articles we looked at, all four were flagged as AI-generated.
How Customized Bottled Water is Shaping Lifestyle Trends
Source: https://app.originality.ai/share/259gildvercm7f0a
Unlocking Nature’s Secret to Stress Relief
Source: https://app.originality.ai/share/9l6j4vcy21q8px3d
Six Promising Tips to Help You Maintain an Active Lifestyle
Source: https://app.originality.ai/share/8nsel9oc12xmk7hp
Breaking Down 3 Best Events of 2024 ─ What They Did Right
Source: https://app.originality.ai/share/j3h9mp4sz8edw52y
But Vujo’s SEO strategy was about to come crashing down.
It’s no secret that Google’s major algorithm updates over the last year or so have significantly shaken up the SEO industry.
At first glance, it would be easy to think that every single brand has been hit hard by the updates and is struggling to recover, but that isn’t quite true.
Yes, it’s true that most brands saw a significant hit to traffic at first, but many of the best sites have already started to see their traffic return.
The sites that are still struggling are those that have lost the user as their main focus and are replacing it with spammy SEO practices such as keyword-stuffed articles and generic, unhelpful content. But they’ll recover once they make some necessary rewrites and replan their strategy.
The brands that have really struggled and will likely never recover? Those that leaned fully into AI, spammy content.
Much like all of Vujo’s acquisitions.
Google’s major updates this summer have focused almost entirely on the eradication of AI-generated content, instead focusing on promoting content that is truly helpful to its users. Content that truly adds value and takes conversations forward has been championed, whereas rehashed conversations that are already available online have been punished.
Given that generative AI is only capable in scraping the web for it’s responses, rather than bringing new information to the fore, it should come as no surprise that this type of content has been hit the hardest by Google.
And one of the most impacted website owners was Vujo, with his website The Frisky acting as a prime example. In fact, just look at the traffic drop:
A site that once averaged 30k visitors per month is now sitting at zero.
But it wasn’t just Google that decided enough was enough in regards to spammy, AI-generated content. MediaVine has also recently been coming down hard on sites relying on AI-generated content, stating in a blog post earlier this year that they were “developing faster, automated tools to help us identify low-quality, mass-produced AI content across the web.”
This new approach was on full show after a Reddit account widely assumed to be associated with Vujo posted this thread:
In a matter of months, Vuja’s content factory had shifted from thousands in traffic and ad revenue to zero.
So, what can we take from all this?
Well, one thing is sure beyond doubt. An over-reliance on AI for content production might seem tempting in the short term, but it is absolutely critical to keep user intent, quality, and authenticity at the heart of your content production.
Many content creators are under more pressure than ever to pump out as much content as possible in the search for short-term gains, but hopefully, examples such as Vujo’s will prevent you from doing so. At the very least, it can act as a case study that you can use to push back on the decision-maker's demands.
When generative AI burst onto the scene, it is no secret that Google’s immediate response was to slam the door closed, pushing traffic to a tiny amount of websites that it trusts.
Now, Google is slowly starting to reopen that door to more and more sites that it trusts. Site’s that provide users with high-quality content first and foremost. Sites that use AI to help with content strategy, but focus on writing great content that is legitimately helpful from there.
Ask yourself one question.
Will your site be part of that list?
Find out if your website contains AI-generated content with the Originality.ai Site Scan. Scan your entire website for AI content in 1 click.
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
