Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
Generative models are an unsupervised type of machine learning model that use artificial intelligence, probability distribution, and statistics to produce a computer-generated representation of a targeted variable calculated from prior observations, input or datasets. This means they can generate new or synthetic data after being trained on a real dataset hence the name “generative.”
This is what's powering the current wave of AI content creation. See, generative modeling can be used to create a wide range of content, from text to images. For example, OpenAI's GPT-3, which was trained on billions of parameters, can generate high-quality articles in seconds. Then there are generative AI programs like Midjourney, that can produce photorealistic images with a simple text prompt.
In this article, we're going to discuss generative models, and how they relate to AI content creation. We'll go over what generative models are (and what they're not), how they work, and their challenges and limitations.
Before we can fully understand generative models and how they relate to AI content creation, it's essential to define what generative models are not: discriminative models. While they're both types of statistical models, there are some key differences that set them apart.
The goal of generative modeling is to learn the joint probability distribution of a dataset. In other words, it determines the likelihood of more than one event, say A and B, happening at the same time.
When it comes to language tasks, this means that generative models use the joint distribution to determine the likelihood of seeing a particular set of words and phrases together in a text. Basically, it learns the patterns and structures within an existing dataset, and uses them to create new content.
For example, if you ask a generative model to write a poem about the moon, it would use its knowledge of language, poetry, and the moon to create a brand-new poem.
Discriminative modeling, on the other hand, would take a different approach to this moon poem. A discriminative model is more of a traditional machine learning model. It deals with conditional probability, where it determines the likelihood of A happening based on the fact that B already occurred.
This is the key difference between generative and discriminative models: generative modeling uses the joint probability of an entire dataset to create new content, while discriminative modeling uses conditional probability to distinguish between different types of data.
So, when it comes to our moon poem, discriminator networks would identify what features would distinguish a moon poem from others. It would then be able to classify whether a given poem is about the moon or not.
See, while a discriminative approach can help you classify or tell the difference between different types of data, it can't necessarily use this information to generate unique content. And it's this distinction that makes a generative approach ideal for content creation.
The first thing a generative network needs is an established dataset to learn from. This dataset is often made up of real and not synthetic data.
So, to train a generative model, you need to collect a large amount of existing data in certain domains. The data could comprise texts, images, or sounds, depending on what you want to generate.
Generative models learn from the established dataset before coming up with new data of their own. They learn from the natural features of the data and understand the categories and dimensions of the datasets.
Take AI image generation, for example. AI image generators will start by generating rough images before learning color differentiation, edges, blobs, backgrounds, textures, objects, the natural placement of objects, etc. The more they learn, the better they are at generating believable, realistic images.
Generative models are tweaked and worked on until their accuracy is very high, and they can generate synthetic data that is almost indistinguishable from real-life, human-made data. The more parameters used to train the dataset, the more accurate the model is.
That said, there is the problem of overfitting. Overfitting occurs when the synthetic data generated by the model is too close to the original data.
At first glance, this might seem like the end goal, but overfitting means that the model is not as creative as it should be.
The essence of generative models is their creativity in data generation. So you should avoid overfitting at all costs. Cross-validation and other techniques will help avoid overfitting during generative model training.
Large language models (LLMs) are the latest class of generative AI models used for content generation. These deep learning algorithms can create artificial text content and large bodies of sentences. ChatGPT is a prime example of this.
The generated sentences are not incoherent ramblings or meaningless sentences strung together. On the contrary, generative AI models can write great essays, business plans, and even compose poems using natural language processing. They can also summarize books and explain difficult concepts.
AI generative models are so good that they understand intricate concepts like writing tones. You could ask some content generation models to write original content like a child or a top-level professor, and you would get astonishing results.
Popular language models include GPT-3, BLOOM, BERT, and GPT-NeoX. These models are trained using large chunks of texts from datasets comprising Wikipedia, books, webpages, historical documents, academic papers, etc.
A more niched large language model is the fine-tuned language model. Fine-tuned language models are smaller than large language models. But they are well-suited for composing texts within a specific subject matter or industry.
Some fine-tuned language models may be designed specifically for medicine, while some may be trained for simple historical quizzes. Fine-tuned language models require less computing power and take less time to train.
Here are the major generative model limitations and challenges:
While many advancements have been made concerning AI generative models, they still remain quite inaccurate. Many people can still tell the difference between human-generated work and AI-generated work.
Generative models can only be trained using powerful computer graphics processing units (GPUs) and central processing units (CPUs). These make them very expensive to develop and train. It has also hampered the ability of several individual researchers to work on and improve these models.
Using generative models has given rise to several ethical issues. Issues like plagiarism, deepfakes, students using AI for assignments as opposed to learning on their own, copyright issues, and much more.
Since AI generative models are fairly recent, there haven't been strict governing bodies and regulatory institutions to create standardized rulesets to govern the use and misuse of the models. That said, hopefully, a defining code of conduct concerning the ethics of generative models and their usage will be available to protect every party involved very soon.
There are valid fears and concerns that using generative models will put millions of people out of work. AI generative models could affect copywriters, blog writers, literature writers, speech writers, poets, artists, and even musicians.
Generative models will continue to improve and see far more use cases than what we have now. We will see more generative model applications in engineering, architecture, real estate, and advanced data visualization.
Also, the rise of open-source research in artificial intelligence and machine learning will enable AI generative models to become more accessible to more people. Computer hardware and software will get better, and just about anyone will be able to take part in it.
Fun fact, a research study by Gartner predicts that by 2025, over 30% of discovered drugs and materials will be fueled by generative models.
We are still in the early stages of generative model usage, but we can expect many more applications in the near future.
Examples of generative models are variational autoencoders (VAEs), Bayesian networks, diffusion models, restricted Boltzmann machines (RBMS), generative adversarial networks (GANs), and autoregressive models.
While it is a type of neural network architecture, convolutional neural networks are mainly used as discriminative models, especially when it comes to images. CNNs usually focus on classifying, detecting, and recognizing images.
They can be used to plagiarize creative work and impersonate individuals. They also cause an increase in bias and can cause unemployment.
Generative models are trained on large datasets containing the data they need to imitate or generate. Repeated and lengthy training causes the models to understand every dimension and facet of the data. Generative models can generate images, text, videos, and music.
They require huge computational power, and there could be issues with training stability.
Generative models use neural networks to train and improve themselves. They're a subset of artificial intelligence.
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
Save up to 23% on our Pro and Enterprise subscriptions
See Our Pricing