Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
When you think of plagiarism, you might think of copying and pasting someone else’s words and claiming them as your own. Yet, plagiarism casts a much wider net — from outright verbatim copying to more subtle appearances.
The consequences of plagiarism are anything but subtle. Depending on the severity, they range from academic expulsion to legal proceedings.
We’ll take a closer look at the types of plagiarism as well as examples of each one. You may be surprised to learn about some forms of plagiarism because of how innocent and innocuous they seem. The reality is that no matter their complexity, all variations of plagiarism carry significant ethical considerations, risks, and repercussions. Let’s take a closer look.
There are many different types of plagiarism that carry substantial consequences from harming credibility to expulsion from educational institutions.
The eight primary forms of plagiarism include:
Direct plagiarism is also called copy-and-paste plagiarism or verbatim plagiarism. It happens when someone copies an author or source’s text word for word without crediting or attributing the author. This is one of the more insidious forms of plagiarism because there’s a clear intent to present someone else’s work as one’s own.
Let’s assume an expert on electric vehicles made the following statement:
“In recent years, electric vehicles (EVs) have surged in popularity as a sustainable alternative to traditional gasoline-powered cars. These vehicles are powered by electric motors, which use energy stored in rechargeable batteries. One of the more significant advantages of electric vehicles is their contribution to reducing carbon emissions, a major factor in climate change.”
Direct plagiarism would involve someone copying that expert’s text word for word and presenting it as if it were their own analysis and insights on electric vehicles.
Can you plagiarize yourself? As it turns out, yes you can.
Let’s say that in 2020, you submitted a research paper on the impact of digital marketing on consumer behavior. You wrote, “The integration of social media platforms into marketing strategies has greatly influenced consumer purchasing decisions. This, in turn, led to an increased emphasis on digital advertising to help drive sales.”
Then, in 2024, you were invited to present new trends in digital marketing. You might state, “My research has shown that the integration of social media platforms into marketing strategies has greatly influenced consumer purchasing decisions. This, in turn, has led to an increased emphasis on digital advertising to help drive sales.”
In short, you’ve reused considerable parts of your own previously published work without proper acknowledgment that the material was previously published.
You’re presenting the content as new and original research, even though you pulled it from earlier work. The audience, therefore, believes it’s new when it isn’t. This can backfire and cause issues in terms of your credibility and integrity in the industry.
There are several ways to remedy this.
Mosaic plagiarism is also known as patchwork plagiarism or ‘patchwriting.’ It happens when a writer takes phrases from different sources (or the same source) and makes them a part of their own work without properly citing the original author. The resulting work is woven into theirs in such a way as to disguise the plagiarized text.
This type of plagiarism is more difficult for plagiarism checkers to detect because it involves such subtle alterations. Writers who engage in mosaic plagiarism will slightly rephrase sentences, use synonyms, and alter the sentence structure to keep the same meaning but use different words.
For example, let’s say that the plagiarizing author pulls from two different sources about saving for retirement. The first author writes, “Starting early with your retirement savings can significantly increase the potential for a larger financial nest egg, thanks to the power of compound interest.”
The second writes, “Many experts recommend diversifying your retirement portfolio across various asset classes to help mitigate risk and optimize returns.”
An example of mosaic plagiarism using these two sources would read, “Initiating your retirement fund at a young age could considerably boost the size of your savings due to the compounding effect of interest. It’s often advised to spread investments for retirement across different types of assets, reducing potential risks while improving the chance of better gains.”
In this example, the mosaic plagiarized text heavily borrows from the concepts presented by the original two sources. It adds synonyms and slightly rewords sentences, so it’s harder to detect.
Accidental plagiarism happens when the author forgets to cite sources or does so incorrectly. This happens due to a lack of understanding of citation rules or an oversight. Although there’s no specific intent to deceive or pass the work off as their own, it can nevertheless have serious consequences.
Let’s imagine a student is writing a term paper about the historical and cultural significance of tea in China.
As they’re writing, they come across an interesting tidbit about the introduction of tea in Britain and how this has impacted British tea culture. However, the student can’t remember if the insight came from their thoughts or something they read.
The original source might read, “The introduction of tea in Britain in the early 17th century had a profound impact on British social customs, eventually making tea an integral part of British culture.”
The student’s text might read, “Tea was introduced to Britain in the early 17th century. It significantly influenced social customs and today is deeply woven into the fabric of British culture.”
The student has failed to cite the source of the information on the cultural impact of tea in British culture. This is considered accidental plagiarism. That’s why it’s so important to keep sources and notes organized.
Notes are a convenient reference, so you’ll know what ideas and insights come from where and can cite works appropriately. Free tools like Zotero or Mendeley integrate with word processing programs. They can be used to help keep sources streamlined and organized efficiently.
Global plagiarism is similar to verbatim plagiarism but rather than take a few sentences here and there, the perpetrator takes the entire work.
For instance, a student has to write an essay on the impact of euthanasia on families of terminal cancer patients. Rather than actually doing the research on their own to see what information is out there, they find an essay written by another student that was shared online.
The student downloads the entire essay and submits it under their name without changing any of it. Global plagiarism of this kind is also common with essay-sharing or writing services where students pay others to do their work for them.
Using such a service undermines academic integrity and prevents the student from learning critical thinking and writing skills. Using these types of services can have serious consequences — from a failing grade to suspension or expulsion.
Today, institutions frequently use plagiarism checkers to identify student works that are made with paid essay writing or essay-sharing services.
Incremental plagiarism is particularly deceptive in the context of plagiarism examples. It involves collecting different sources in such small amounts that they are difficult to detect. Imagine a large accumulation of snippets of text.
Imagine that a university student is working on a paper about the psychological effects of social media.
The first source says, “A recent study shows that excessive social media use leads to increased feelings of anxiety and loneliness in teenagers.”
The second source says, “Experts argue that by constantly presenting idealized lives, social media contributes to users’ own dissatisfaction with themselves.”
The student might write, “Studies have shown that teenagers who frequently use social media have higher levels of loneliness and anxiety. It has been argued by professionals that idealized portrayals of life on social media fosters dissatisfaction among users with their own lives.”
The student incrementally plagiarizes by taking small pieces of content from different sources and slightly rewording them to weave them into their paper without citing the original authors. This misrepresents what part of the work is the student’s original contribution and undermines the integrity of their work.
Source-based plagiarism involves misrepresenting the source of information in a given work. In the age of AI, it’s entirely possible that platforms like Google Gemini and ChatGPT, will make up sources that don’t exist, and don’t hold up to proper fact-checking. This can give the paper an air of authority and credibility, which, on closer examination, is false and misleading.
For example, a student is writing about the benefits of the cabbage soup diet. They claim that it significantly reduces the risk of heart disease. To help back up their claim, they cite a publication in a purported reputable medical journal. For instance:
“According to a study published in the Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology, individuals who adhere to the cabbage soup diet had a 50% lower risk of heart disease compared to those following a standard American diet.”
It sounds convincing until you learn that the Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology isn’t a real medical journal and is completely fabricated, as is the study itself.
This type of plagiarism can also have significant repercussions, especially if the information is taken as fact and people’s health is harmed as a result of following fabricated information.
Translating a text from one language to another without crediting the author is translation plagiarism. Like incremental and mosaic plagiarism, translation plagiarism can be difficult to detect because there are few plagiarism checkers that offer comprehensive checks in languages other than English.
Let’s imagine that someone was involved in a detailed study on new trends in wine production. The original English might look something like this:
“Recent trends in wine production indicate a shift toward sustainable farming practices, aiming to reduce environmental impact and improve the livelihood of farmers.”
Now let’s imagine that this statement was translated and presented at a conference in eastern Spain (a heavy wine-producing area) in the Catalan language. The offender might simply take that text and translate it as, “Les tendències en la producció de vi indiquen un canvi cap a pràctiques d’agricultura sostenible amb l’objectiu de reduir l’impacte ambiental i millorar els mitjans de vida dels agricultors.”
When the translation is done without attribution to the original source, it suggests that the translated content is the translator’s original analysis or observation.
As you can see, plagiarism isn’t simply about copying directly from a source. It involves a very broad set of circumstances, from direct or copy-and-paste plagiarism to a translator translating text to another language and then passing it off as their work.
Learning about the different plagiarism examples is essential to providing clarity about what plagiarism is.
The good news is that Originality.ai has a robust plagiarism checker built into its comprehensive AI writing detection. You can choose to check a word for plagiarism and AI writing, or each one, respectively, giving you the flexibility to make sure the work you’re reviewing is of the highest possible quality and integrity.
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
