Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
Like many other industries, AI is rapidly transforming the field of journalism. Integrating AI in articles and on journalism as a whole has created a host of important discussions about its implications for the industry including its effect on news accuracy, the role of human journalists and ethical considerations. Here’s what you need to know about how AI-generated articles are affecting the world of journalism right now.
AI-generated articles are articles created by AI tools. They’re created by entering a prompt, such as keywords or phrases about certain topics. The AI then goes to work, stitching together information from its vast repository of data while leveraging machine learning and other algorithms to identify the next word in the sentence. The end result is an authentic-looking (albeit somewhat dry and repetitive) article.
Most notably, AI-generated articles lack the originality and insight of human-crafted articles. AI can be used to quickly whip up an outline or speed up the writing process, but there should still be a human in the loop. The reason for this is two-fold: AI tends to “scratch the surface” of a given topic, and secondly, if it doesn’t know the answer, it will make up statements with complete conviction.
AI-generated articles have a number of pros and cons associated with them. Notable advantages include:
Increased efficiency and productivity - AI can produce content faster than human writers through its ability to analyze large datasets, saving time and resources.
Lower operational costs - By automating routine tasks, media outlets can allocate resources to more in-depth investigative journalism.
Improved accuracy and objectivity - AI helps minimize human error and bias in reporting, presenting facts objectively and impartially.
Greater personalization - AI can tailor content to readers’ preferences over time, increasing engagement and overall satisfaction.
However, with these benefits come several significant drawbacks, including:
Limitations in Understanding - AI still struggles to understand nuances and subtlety which is vital for impactful journalism
Ethical Concerns and Misinformation - AI can inadvertently generate or spread misinformation which is one of the major dilemmas of relying completely on algorithms for news.
Job Displacement - AI has the potential to replace human journalists, which impacts employment and professional skills development.
Loss of the “Human Touch” - Journalism is about more than just reporting facts; it’s about telling stories that resonate on a human level. With AI-generated articles, this loss of the human touch is felt on a considerable level.
As you can see above, AI has the capacity to churn out news at a speed that’s simply unparalleled. This frees up the manpower of media outlets to concentrate on pieces with more substance. Having AI analyze relevant datasets saves a great deal of time when it comes to data-driven journalism.
But in creating journalistic content at this scale, integrity and creativity are seriously eroded. Things that come naturally to human writers, like infusing a piece with emotion and making it engaging and interesting, are foreign to AI. Beyond this, AI is known to invent false narratives or even exhibit biases inherent in its training data, which can seep through in the “facts” it generates.
AI has the potential to quickly verify facts and analyze hoards of data, uncovering patterns or trends that might not be immediately apparent to individuals. We’ve already touched on the issues of potential biases within the algorithms, but there’s also concerns about transparency and accountability.
AI can behave partially based on its training data. In order to maintain journalistic integrity, there needs to be a balance between the technological advances that AI presents, and the human touch that machines cannot emulate.
As AI becomes more intertwined in the news process, it raises critical ethics questions that we as a society must answer. For example, who “owns” the content that AI creates? Who’s “watching the watchers” when it comes to training the AI? What about privacy concerns?
Public opinion in terms of media accuracy and trust is already highly eroded. As human journalistic skills get more and more devalued, there are fewer diverse voices in the media and in the industry as a whole. This in turn leads to a more homogenized perspective. And that is to say nothing of how far the media will let the AI go.
In short, ethical standards need to be created so that this tool, like so many others, continues to benefit society while minimizing harm. Journalists, ethicists and technologists as well as the general public all need to come together to decide how AI will be used from this point forward, because it certainly won’t be stopping any time soon.
Another key benefit of AI is that it has dramatically lowered the barriers to entry for the sharing of news; letting a wide range of voices contribute to the public discussions. AI allows for a broader distribution of news by automating the heavy lifting of content creation and custom curation. This leads to news that is closely tailored to match the individuals’ interests.
However this custom-curated news is also a double-edged sword, as it creates the very real possibility of an echo chamber in which AI can massively amplify disinformation. Making sure that AI contributes positively to the democratization of news means adding in mechanisms that promote transparency, diversity and accuracy. In this way, AI can improve access to a wide range of information which in turn creates a more informed public.
AI won’t exactly storm through the newsroom and gobble up everyone’s jobs. Most likely, as with every other new technology that came along (including TV, the internet, social media and so on), AI will work alongside humans, creating a sort of hybrid model where the two forces work together to amplify each other’s strengths. AI works best when handling data-intensive tasks while humans do better at areas that require more emotional intelligence and creative storytelling.
If you’re concerned about AI-generated articles affecting the quality of your journalism, or you suspect that AI-written content is amplifying disinformation or misinformation, you can check to see if your content has been written with AI using Originality.AI. With over 99% accuracy on the latest AI models including ChatGPT 3.5 and 4, Google Bard and many more, Originality.AI uses the latest in machine learning and NLP programming to uncover AI-written text in journalism and beyond. Special monthly credits packages and ongoing access are available for individuals and teams. Try it now and see the results for yourself!
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
