Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
Plagiarism is often viewed as something that’s “not a problem unless you get caught”. But with the advent of digital technology and now AI, the prevalence of plagiarism is greater than ever. It also sometimes creates fierce debates on originality, ethics and the delicate line between being inspired by someone’s work and outright stealing it.
Given how accessible information is today, plagiarism has been thrust into the spotlight once again, forcing us to answer some very important questions like: Is it still plagiarism if an AI writes it? Or, can you plagiarize yourself? These are important questions that have no simple answer. But in order to try to shed some light on the problem, it’s helpful to look at examples of plagiarism throughout history and across different types of media.
Some of the examples of plagiarism you’re about to see are surprising. Some are shocking. But all of them fall under the very large umbrella of plagiarism. Let’s take a look at some of the biggest plagiarism examples and what the repercussions were, as well as how to avoid it yourself.
Plagiarism is using someone else’s work or ideas without properly citing or attributing the work to them. It can span many different types of materials including text, music, images and even in some cases, ideas. Plagiarism is unethical and comes with serious consequences or even legal penalties across every major field including professional, journalistic and academic.
Plagiarism itself can come in different forms. Most people are familiar with direct plagiarism, which is copying someone else’s work verbatim without citing them or giving them credit for it. However there are other types of plagiarism that can seem to “fly under the radar”, like mosaic plagiarism, where someone takes phrases or ideas from someone else’s work without giving credit, or paraphrasing plagiarism, where the author writes someone else’s ideas using different words (and again, without proper attribution).
That being said, some instances of plagiarism are easy to prove and others are quite difficult. Read on for some surprising examples and decide for yourself, is it really plagiarism?
Since man began carving stories into stone, there have likely been accusations of plagiarism. One of the more famous examples happened to well-known author and activist Hellen Keller. Keller, who became blind and deaf while still a baby, wrote a story when she was 12 years old entitled “The Frost King”.
Later, it was discovered that her story strongly resembled a similar story by Margaret Canby’s “The Frost Fairies”. Keller insisted she had no conscious memory of ever reading Canby’s story but concedes that maybe it was read to her when she was younger and somehow she retained pieces of the plot in the back of her mind.
Another example came from Alex Haley’s “Roots” published in 1976. Haley was accused of plagiarism by a man named Harold Courlander, who wrote a novel entitled “The African”. A court examined the two works and determined that the similarities between them were more than just a coincidence. Eventually Haley settled with Courlander, all the while insisting that “Roots” was his own, original creation.
We’ve all heard countless stories throughout our lives. And it’s entirely possible that some of those plots and even character types could seep into our subconscious. How do you know if it’s truly yours or something you heard years or even decades ago? How do you prove it?
One of the more famous examples of plagiarism in academia involves Doris Kearns Goodwin, a historian and winner of the Pulitzer Prize. In 1987 she published a book entitled “The Fitzgeralds and the Kennedys: An American Saga”. Years passed and in 2002, it was discovered that she had lifted passages from numerous other works and included them without citing the original articles.
When she was asked, she insisted that it was unintentional and blamed her disorganized note-taking process. She claims to have accidentally mixed her own notes with the notes of other authors. Goodwin and her publisher eventually settled with at least one of the authors who had accused her of plagiarism. She then went on to correctly cite the authors and republish her work with proper attributions.
Fortunately, there are ways to avoid plagiarism now while keeping notes and sources organized, so combing through a disheveled stack of papers can be a thing of the past!
The music world is rife with accusations of plagiarism in music. Everything from beats to lyrics to entire songs has been the subject of controversy and lawsuits citing plagiarism and copyright infringement. One of the more notorious cases involved George Harrison of the Beatles and his song My Sweet Lord. He was challenged in court by Bright Tunes Music, the publisher of “He’s So Fine” by the Chiffons. “My Sweet Lord” was released in 1970, whereas “He’s So Fine” was written by Ronnie Mack for the Chiffons in 1963.
Can you hear the similarities? You might be surprised to learn that Harrison was found guilty of “subconscious plagiarism” because he believed he had unintentionally copied the melody. Later, he acquired the rights to the song and ended up buying the very music he was accused of plagiarizing.
In the art world, a notable example of plagiarism involved the famous HOPE poster of Barack Obama. This poster was used throughout his campaign, however, Shepard Fairey, the artist behind the poster, was challenged by the Associated Press for using a photo of Obama taken by Mannie Garcia. At first Fairey maintained that he had used a different photo and claimed fair use, however it was later shown that he did indeed use the AP photograph. The case was settled in 2011 with a split of the profits from the HOPE poster.
Can using someone’s likeness from a photograph to create an artistic poster be considered fair use? What do you think?
Back in 2003, journalist Jayson Blair of the New York Times was discovered to have lied about and plagiarized parts of his stories ranging from national events to human interest stories. He had run the gamut from stealing content from other newspapers to lying about where he was during certain assignments.
His plagiarism caused such an upheaval at the New York Times that top editors resigned and a spotlight was shone firmly on editorial oversight as well as the ethics in journalism.
Even more egregious was Stephen Glass and his work as a reporter for the New Republic.. He even went so far to include fake websites, voicemails and notes to corroborate his stories, even though he fabricated them all. His plagiarism was discovered after an investigation by Forbes Digital Tool looked into the background of his story “Hack Heaven” about a teenage hacker. He was later fired and a film made about his fall from grace called “Shattered Glass”.
Because of the nature of trying to prove copyright infringement, instances of outright plagiarism in films and television are rarer than, say, music, where one can hear when a melody or beat has clearly been lifted from another song.
One of the more famous cases of plagiarism in film had to do with the 1988 movie “Coming to America” starring Eddit murphy. Columnist and humorist Art Buchwald sued Paramount, claiming that the film was based on a script he had written called “King for a Day” which he had submitted to the studio. Buchwald argued that his script, which detailed the story of a rich, foreign prince moving to the U.S. to find love, bore numerous similarities to the plot of “Coming to America”. In 1992, the court agreed with Buchwald and he was awarded damages.
In another more recent case, the Last Samurai, a 2003 film with Tom Cruise, was the subject of a plagiarism lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed by Aaron and Matthew Benay who claimed that the story was considerably similar to a screenplay they had written and submitted to a production company in 2000 in which a westerner also immerses himself in samurai culture in Japan. Although the case was initially dismissed in 2005, an appeal led to a ruling in favor of the Benay brothers and the suit was eventually settled out of court under undisclosed terms.
This type of settlement often happens in cases that deal with intellectual property, especially when there’s a fine line drawn between inspiration and outright plagiarism. Oftentimes copyright laws are determined specifically in each case which can make it difficult to create a “one size fits all” approach to plagiarism in film and movies. Oftentimes Hollywood will settle out of court to avoid ongoing legal battles.
In 2014, Benny Johnson, a viral politics editor at Buzzfeed committed numerous instances of plagiarism. During an internal review it was found that there were over 40 instances where Johnson copied text without attribution. Buzzfeed promptly acknowledged the issue and fired Johnson, highlighting the challenges of maintaining journalistic standards despite the breakneck pace of digital publishing.
Meanwhile, Jukin Media, a video licensing company, has reported spotting numerous issues where their content was reuploaded and shared on Facebook without proper attribution. With the vast reach and ease of sharing on social media, widespread use of content, including things like reuploads and remixes, can be pervasive. Rather than tying this unauthorized use to a specific court case, Jukin Media normally reports copyright infringement through the offending platform’s channels to get the content removed or to get correct attribution added.
Having all of these different examples of plagiarism across literature, academia, art, journalism, music and even the web showcase the very real and ongoing challenge of maintaining integrity and originality in an age where instant access to information is always available. From historical cases involving well-known authors and musicians to modern-day scandals, plagiarism is not a simple question with a simple answer.
At the heart, plagiarism is a violation of intellectual property rights which in turn ripples out to deteriorate trust and respect that are needed as the foundation for an ongoing exchange of ideas. The cases shown here demonstrate not only how easy it is to fall into the trap of using others’ work without citing it, but just how easy it is to do by pure oversight, accident or even malicious intent. And the consequences can pile up quickly: legal battles, scandal, resignation and even financial costs can add up quickly.
But these plagiarism examples are presented here as more than just a way to draw attention to famous authors, singers and screenwriters. The examples show just how our understanding of copyright and intellectual property has to evolve over time. With online platforms, the ability to consume and share content has exploded. Alongside this development, new mechanisms, particularly AI, have to be tamed in order to be used effectively without undermining human creativity or ingenuity.
Although with the advent of AI writing detection platforms and plagiarism detectors like Originality.AI, the job is much easier, it is by no means finished. Uncovering plagiarism requires vigilance and a commitment to understanding the value of one’s own original touch and creative mark on the world. By looking at these examples of plagiarism, we can all learn what it means to draw inspiration from a work versus copy it outright.
No matter what the future holds, we must continue to create environments where creativity and ingenuity can flourish, backed by trust in the foundations that bring us information, entertainment and education. By taking care of the rights of all creators, we help create a society and culture that’s focused on originality at its core.
If you’re looking to help prevent plagiarism in text or AI written content, try Originality.AI today. With built-in content tools like a comprehensive plagiarism checker, fact checker, readability tool and more, there’s no better way to publish with integrity.
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
Save up to 23% on our Pro and Enterprise subscriptions
See Our Pricing