AI Studies
Company AI Policy Examples and Templates - Who Has Banned ChatGPT
Banning ChatGPT at Work? Get Compliant Fast! Free AI Policy Examples and Templates for Your Company.
Trusted By Industry Leaders
Trusted By Industry Leaders
Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
With the versatile capabilities of generative AI tools like ChatGPT, many large companies are taking steps to prohibit its use internally amongst staff and within organizational policies and procedures. While research by BlackBerry shows that nearly 75% of IT decision-makers believe that these bans demonstrate "excessive control" when it comes to bring-your-own and corporate devices, it's not stopping some of the biggest organizations in the world from blocking or at least limiting use of the platform.
Of course, there are many reasons that companies may choose to ban any kind of program at the workplace. They may not like using third-party applications for business purposes, or consider it a distraction to employees. But when it comes to ChatGPT in particular, there are two reasons that seem to stand out: privacy concerns and data protection, and damage to corporate reputation.
Perhaps the number one reason that companies are banning ChatGPT is to protect their confidential information. In fact, almost 70% of respondents to a BlackBerry survey said they were blocking ChatGPT for this reason. They fear that such a powerful tool could potentially open their companies up to cybersecurity threats and other unknown risks around disclosure of sensitive data and internal communications, which is why some are implementing Zero Trust for cloud security.
And their cautiousness isn't completely unfounded. Take Samsung, for example. They banned the generative AI tool after they found that sensitive code had been uploaded by an employee.
Amazon has similar reasons for limiting the use of ChatGPT among employees. They've found examples of responses from the generative AI program that look suspiciously similar to the company's confidential information.
But protecting against potential leaks of source code and other types of internal data aren't the only concerns. In the same survey, nearly 60% of respondents worried that ChatGPT could negatively affect their corporate reputation.
And again, companies have good reason to exercise caution here. While it can help increase efficiency around the office, there are still some serious limitations to ChatGPT that could cause irreparable damage to a company's reputation.
For example, while it can generate human-like responses, it has trouble understanding context, and just generally possesses a lack of common sense and emotional intelligence. This can lead to ChatGPT responses that many would consider inappropriate. And if any of these responses made it into their marketing materials, it could put a lot of companies into hot water.
Together, these measures highlight the cautious approach that these organizations are adopting to navigate the potential risks associated with large language models like ChatGPT and its capabilities, including both legal and reputational consequences.
In an early 2024 update, Google announced that it would help remove unhelpful content from search, which resulted in 1,446 websites with AI content having manual actions applied to them, and being deindexed.
With manual actions now being applied to websites with heavy AI content being used, we’ve begun to see others move away from AI generated content. After an AI surge over the last couple of years, are we now starting to see a move against AI content? Potentially… but we wanted to dig into this further and see what websites, if any, are implementing policies against AI generated content.
Updated in April 2024, the Google Merchant Center has announced that they will be introducing specific attributes for AI-generated content in shopping ads and free listings. They state “we’re adding new attributes that will require merchants to disclose text content that was created using generative AI”.
Source: https://support.google.com/merchants/answer/14784710
Google Search has stated that AI spam content will not be tolerated and, starting with their most recent March update, have begun to take action against websites with heavily generated AI content.
AI content should not be used with the main purpose of ranking in search engines nor should it be claimed as human-written.
To read more about how Google is penalizing AI content in their search results, you can read our studies below:
In May 2024, Medium.com began its implementation of strict AI policies stating that AI-generated content, whether disclosed or not, will not be allowed as part of their Partner Program. They stated that “Beginning May 1, 2024, stories with AI-generated writing (disclosed as such or not) are not allowed to be paywalled as part of our Partner Program”.
CNET has created a specific AI policy on their site, which states that they have created and use an in-house AI tool, called RAMP (Responsible AI Machine Partner), to generate some content. However, they also state that “every piece of content we publish is factual, original and edited by a human”. However, Red Ventures, which owns CNET, does not have any policies relating to AI content in their terms or policies.
Source: https://www.cnet.com/ai-policy/
Elsevier, one of the largest scientific publishers online, has included specific policies around AI, stating that AI “technologies should only be used to improve readability and language of the work and not to replace key authoring tasks such as producing scientific, pedagogic, or medical insights, drawing scientific conclusions, or providing clinical recommendations”. They also state that authors must disclose any use of AI in their manuscripts.
Wired has developed a specific policy against the use of generative AI, stating that they “do not publish stories with text generated AI” and “do not publish text edited by AI either”. They do state that AI may be used to generate ideas, headlines or research.
Source: https://www.wired.com/about/generative-ai-policy/
Salesforce has created an entire Acceptable Use Policy with regards to AI, stating multiple use cases in which AI cannot be used, including professional advice and decision-making processes.
Although there is no specific policy yet created, Allrecipes.com states on their About Us page that it is “against our guidelines to publish automatically generated content using AI writing tools such as ChatGPT”.
Source: https://www.allrecipes.com/about-us-6648102
Although there is no specific policy yet created, People.com states in their About Us page that it is “against our guidelines to publish automatically generated content using AI writing tools such as ChatGPT”.
Source: https://people.com/about-us-5499056
Although there is no specific policy yet created, thespruce.com states in their About Us page that it is “against our guidelines to publish automatically generated content using AI writing tools such as ChatGPT”.
Source: https://www.thespruce.com/the-spruce-editorial-policy-5196319
In November, 2023, Youtube announced an update to their policies, stating that they will “introduce updates that inform viewers when the content they’re seeing is synthetic [and] require creators to disclose when they’ve created altered or synthetic content that is realistic, including using AI tools”.
Source: https://blog.youtube/inside-youtube/our-approach-to-responsible-ai-innovation/
Although there is no specific policy yet created, southernliving.com states in their About Us page that it is “against our guidelines to publish automatically generated content using AI writing tools such as ChatGPT”. However, DotdashMeredith, which owns Southern Living, does not have any specific statements or policies around AI content.
Source: https://www.southernliving.com/about-us-6502349
In April 2024, Meta announced a number of changes and updates to the way it will handle AI content, including the way they handle manipulated media with their Oversight Board and beginning to label content as “Made with AI”.
LinkedIn addressed AI concerns with a broad statement regarding how they will use and monitor AI usage responsibly, including “reduc[ing] the potential risks of AI” and “ensur[ing] that our use of AI benefits all members fairly, without causing or amplifying unfair bias”.
BBC, one of the world’s largest news outlets, has added specific policies to their editorial guidelines stating that “generative AI should not be used to directly create news content published or broadcast by BBC News/Nations, current affairs or factual journalism unless it is the subject of the content and its use is illustrative”.
Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidance/use-of-artificial-intelligence
Yelp, a popular online review site, has also added specific policies regarding AI in their content guidelines, stating that users “shouldn’t use chatbots or other AI tool to create reviews, including using such tools to draft or revise”.
Source: https://www.yelp.com/guidelines
Amazon, while not having a specific AI policy that can be found on their site, has released a notice to employees stating that they advice against using third-party generative AI tools for all work-related purposes.
As of September 28th, 2023 AWS has updated their Responsible AI Policy that AI can be used as long as it is used responsibly and with the implementation of human review and testing.
Source: https://aws.amazon.com/machine-learning/responsible-ai/policy/
Accenture mentions the Responsible use of AI within articles on its site but no official policy for their employees can be found at this time. In an article published by HR-Brew it is noted that employees are not allowed to use generative AI tools while coding and no company or client data may be uploaded to the generative AI tools without permissions.
Source: https://www.hr-brew.com/stories/2023/05/11/these-companies-have-banned-chatgpt-in-the-office
Amazon, while not having a specific AI policy that can be found on their site, has released a notice to employees stating that they advice against using third-party generative AI tools for all work-related purposes.
Verizon does not have a specific AI policy that can be found on their site at this time. However in a webcast released on Valentine's day of 2023 they stated that ChatGPT is not accessible from their corporate systems to avoid the risk of the potential loss of customer and employer information.
Source: https://www.verizon.com/about/news/speed-february-14-2023
Apple does not have a specific policy against AI that can be found on their website at this time. However according to articles from 2023, AI tools such as ChatGPT and Github’s Copilot are restricted from use for employees of Apple
Source: https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/19/23729619/apple-bans-chatgpt-openai-fears-data-leak
Bank of America does not currently have an official policy available on their website in regards to AI usage, but has been quoted to have added ChatGPT to their list of unauthorized apps and specifically is not allowed for any business related purposes and that the app must be vetted before any use in communications.
Source: https://www.semafor.com/article/05/19/2023/chatgpt-companies-banning-workers
Samsung was one of the first dominos to fall when it came to banning ChatGPT, after the discovery of leaked sensitive internal source code. It is unsure if AI is still banned from employee use however Samsung themselves have opted for the ethical AI route, stating that samsung will comply and fulfill corporate, social, and ethical responsibilities regarding AI Usage.
Commonwealth Bank of Australia has updated their AI policies to include their definition of AI, their AI principles, and how they apply them within the usage of AI systems by the Bank. Specifically, in the design, development, deployment and use of AI systems the following principles of Human, social and environmental well-being, Fairness, Transparency, Privacy and Security, Reliability and Safety, and Accountability be upheld.
Deutsche Bank has been quoted to have banned the use of ChatGPT from their employees devices in 2023, however in present day they have adapted the responsible use of AI outlook. Using AI solutions to automate manual processes and improve customer advisory services. Their commitment to Responsible AI is to ensure that the AI algorithms don’t include hidden discrimination and to ensure factually correct and explainable results.
Source: https://www.db.com/what-we-do/focus-topics/tech/
iHeart Radio was among the 2023 group of companies banning the use of ChatGPT, stating that employees are not permitted to use AI technology for projects unless given explicit direction from their team lead. As of today they have an AI policy in place in their terms stating that all property of iHeardRadio cannot be used, directly or indirectly, with any generative or other artificial intelligence and/or machine learning models.
Source: https://www.iheart.com/content/terms-en-ca/
In February of 2023 JPMorgan Chase was noticed to be temporarily banning the usage of ChatGPT amongst its employees in order to comply with company policy regarding third-party software. JPMorgan Chase has not publicly commented on the restriction but have created their own AI research program within their own company.
Source: https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/22/tech/jpmorgan-chatgpt-employees/index.html
Source: https://www.jpmorgan.com/technology/artificial-intelligence
Wells Fargo was also amongst the large companies to limit usage of ChatGPT for employees, due to it being a third-party software, while evaluating the ‘Safe and Effective Ways’ one could use the AI. Currently Wells Fargo are also creating their own AI ‘Chatbot’ but does not guarantee 24/7 availability or for it to be ‘free of fault or error’
Source: https://www.wellsfargo.com/privacy-security/terms/
The Italian Data Protection Authority has no official policy on AI at this time, and while ChatGPT was banned at one point in Italy, it is currently available for use. However, a recent investigation has concluded that elements with ChatGPT indicate the potential for data privacy violations.
Calix, a telecommunications company specializing in software platforms, systems, and services, was also among the groups banning employee use of ChatGPT. This ban came around as a result of reports that confidential information was leaked from Samsung through the ChatGPT platform. However they are planning to use microsoft copilot once it becomes available.
Source: https://www.lightreading.com/ai-machine-learning/calix-to-ban-chatgpt
Northrop Grumman Corporation, a space and defense tech company, limited employee use of ChatGPT in 2023 until the tech had been fully vetted. Today, they adopted the secure and ethical approach to using AI by ensuring their AI technologies will be ‘ responsible, equitable, traceable, reliable, governable, and auditable and protected against insider threat examples.’
Source: https://gizmodo.com/chatgpt-bot-amazon-ai-apple-1850470688/slides/9
Source: https://www.northropgrumman.com/what-we-do/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning
Spotify, a well known audio streaming service, was reported to have restricted workers' access to ChatGPT after Spotify removed thousands of songs by an AI-music generator. Spotify has not commented on the ChatGPT ban but within their developer policies they ban the use of Spotify in machine learning or AI models.
Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/chatgpt-companies-issued-bans-restrictions-openai-ai-amazon-apple-2023-7#spotify-has-reportedly-restricted-its-workers-from-using-chatgpt-2 Source: https://developer.spotify.com/policy
While PWC did not outright ban the use of ChatGPT in 2023 they did limit the information and use cases of it for their employees. Since then they have collaborated with the World Economic Forum to develop guidelines for AI development across industries and are working on building their own internal AI tool.
Prominent Law Firm Mischcon de Reya has no official policy found on their site on AI usage, however they have been quoted that they do in fact have a “clear policy in place for employees” banning confidential firm and client information from being uploaded into ChatGPT or other outside AI models. They have also created a GPT Legal Prompt Engineer position, to ensure compliance with legal and ethical requirements for AI usage.
Source: https://thelegalreports.com/top-law-firm-bans-use-of-chatgpt/
Citigroup Bank had momentarily banned access to ChatGPT in February, however recently they have begun to test out supervised AI usage for specific people with public data to investigate how AI could be applied cross company.
American Patchwork & Quilting is a community site dedicated to bringing together the quilting community to share quilting patterns, sewing projects, and how-to tutorials. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.allpeoplequilt.com/about-us-8414221#toc-editorial-guidelines
Better Homes & Gardens is a magazine where people can find resources for recipes, home ideas, and gardening information. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.bhg.com/better-homes-and-gardens-editorial-policy-and-standards-5537160
Brides is a long running magazine where those planning to tie the knot can find inspiration, advice, and answers to your burning wedding etiquette questions.Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.brides.com/editorial-guidelines-5222899
Founded in 2013, Byrdie is a magazine dedicated to celebrating and empowering its readers through beauty and style with the utmost transparency.Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.byrdie.com/editorial-guidelines-5196791
Founded in 2020, DailyPaws is a pet parents one stop shop for expert information and pet news that’ll have you purring with delight. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.dailypaws.com/about-daily-paws-7105242#toc-editorial-guidelines
Founded in 1990, EatingWell focuses on healthy eating, sustainability, and exploring worldwide cuisines. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.eatingwell.com/about-us-6743412#toc-editorial-policies
With its first issue, an 18 page insert titled “The International Review of Food and Wine” found in the 1978 March Issue of Playboy, Food and Wine hopes to “inspire its readers to discover, create, and devour the best in food and drink, everyday and everywhere”.Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.foodandwine.com/about-us-6373913#toc-our-history
Founded in 1981, Health’s mission is to inform its readers with “accurate, empathetic, and actionable health information”. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.health.com/health-com-s-editorial-process-5224046
InStyle is a trusted source for fashion, beauty, celebrity, and lifestyle content. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.instyle.com/editorial-guidelines-6825795
Founded in 1999, Investopedia is a trusted source for financial information from those learning about their finances for the first time to experienced investors hoping to learn more. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.investopedia.com/legal-4768893#editorial-policy
Lifewire’s goal is to help its readers understand the ever revolving door of technology, in both products and news. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.lifewire.com/about-us-5081224#toc-editorial-guidelines
Founded in 2009 Liquor.com focuses on “entertaining and educational content” as well as “industry experiences that help working bartenders and other trade professionals develop their skills” . Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.liquor.com/about-us-4782181#toc-artificial-intelligence-policy
MarthaStewart.com is a hub on inspiration and practical advice for cooking, crafting, gardening, entertaining, beauty, weddings, holidays, health, home design, and cleaning, embodying Martha Stewart’s ethos of joyful, innovating living. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.marthastewart.com/about-marthastewart-com-7104054#toc-editorial-guidelines
Midwest Living is a comprehensive lifestyle platform dedicated to all things American Midwest, they offer unique travel,food,shelter, and lifestyle content with a focus on inspiring exploration,adventure, learning, and creativity both on the road and at home. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.midwestliving.com/about-us-7974587#toc-editorial-guidelines
MyDomaine is a trusted resourceful platform that offers curated design content to make home decorating fun, affordable, and attainable. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.mydomaine.com/about-us-4777038
Parents is a trusted resource that provides real-talk, judgment-free advice, as well as a supportive community for caregivers, offering comprehensive and inclusive content that empowers parents through all stages of the parenting journey. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.parents.com/about-us-5271079
RealSimple offers practical solutions for busy lives, including quick recipes, cleaning hacks, fashion advice, health tips, and daily newsletters for easy access to helpful content. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.realsimple.com/about-us-5546943#toc-editorial-guidelines
SeriousEats provides well-researched, expert-tested recipes, and culinary insights, that emphasizes the importance of understanding the science behind cooking while also maintaining a lighthearted approach to food. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Shape provides inclusive, science-backed wellness content, including workouts, beauty advice, mental health information, sexual wellness insight, and a “Health at Every Size” perspective that aims to inspire confidence and enthusiasm in their readers' health journey. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.shape.com/editorial-guidelines-6551078#toc-editorial-ethics
SimplyRecipes is a trusted resource for home cooks. Offering tested recipes, cooking advice, and meal plans designed to help create delicious meals with less stress and more joy. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.simplyrecipes.com/about-us-5096129
Successful Farming is a trusted resource for farming and ranching families. Offering practical advice, resources, and a rich history of service journalism to support your agricultural success. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.agriculture.com/about-us-7487846
The Spruce Eats is a comprehensive food and cooking resource. Offering tested recipes, expert advice, and step-by-step guidance to inspire confidence and creativity in the kitchen for cooks of all levels. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.thespruceeats.com/about-us-4776236#toc-editorial-guidelines
The Spruce Pets is a trusted resource for pet care. Offering practical tips, training advice, and a vet-reviewed library of articles to help pet owners provide the best possible life for their animals. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.thesprucepets.com/about-us-4776796#toc-editorial-guidelines
Treehugger is a leading sustainability site that offers advice, clarity, and inspiration for both the eco-savvy and green-living novices. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.treehugger.com/about-us-5024862#toc-editorial-guidelines
TripSavvy is a trusted travel site that offers expert-written advice and curated recommendations from both locals and seasoned travelers. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.tripsavvy.com/about-us-4777100
VeryWell Family is a trusted resource that provides reliable, compassionate, and up-to-date information on pregnancy and parenting topics. They aim to empower individuals with the best answers and support through all stages of parenthood. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.verywellfamily.com/about-us-5184487
VeryWell Fit is a trusted resource that offers personalized, science-backed advice and tools to help their readers achieve their diet and fitness goals. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.verywellfit.com/our-editorial-process-4778011
VeryWell Health provides easy to understand, expert-written health information, that empowers readers to make informed decisions about their health and well-being. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.verywellhealth.com/verywell-editorial-process-4777042
Wood Magazine is a trusted woodworking resource that offers reliable project plans, woodworking techniques, and product reviews that inspire and inform woodworkers at every stage of their journey. Part of the DotDashMeredith parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.woodmagazine.com/about-us-8549855#toc-who-we-are
Nolo provides consumer-friendly legal information, tools, and resources to help individuals and small businesses resolve their legal issues. Part of the InternetBrands parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.nolo.com/about/about.html#editorial-standards
Bob Vila is a comprehensive resource for homeowners and renters that offers inspiration, education, and step-by-step instructions for home maintenance and improvement projects, backed by experienced experts and thorough research. Part of the Recurrent parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.bobvila.com/editorial-standards/
Polygon is a trusted source for entertainment enthusiasts, they offer expert guidance, in-depth reporting, and engaging content that covers a wide range of interests from video games to anime and movies. Part of the InternetBrands parent company, they have a stated human only approach to creating content and do not allow the use of generative AI tools.
Source: https://www.polygon.com/2019/2/28/18244873/polygon-pitching-guidelines-how-to-pitch
PCMag is a trusted source for independent reviews and expert analysis of the latest technology products and services, they help readers make informed buying decisions and get the most out of their technology. Part of the Ziff Davis parent company, they do not employ AI tools to create original content.
Source: https://www.pcmag.com/about/pcmagcom-mission-statement
Mediavine offers full-service ad representation, their aim is to help website owners optimize their ad inventory and maximize their revenue by working directly with advertisers and managing their ad placements.
Source: https://www.mediavine.com/ai-and-our-commitment-to-a-creator-first-future/
OnlyFans is an 18+ subscription platform that allows creators to monetize their content, develop authentic connections with fans, and provide a safe space for expression. OnlyFans has a policy where AI generated, altered, or enhanced content is only allowed if it is of the content creator, it is in keeping with Terms of Service, and users can tell the content has AI.
Source: https://onlyfans.com/help/3/19/163
Founded in 2003, Steam serves as a platform where creators and publishers can deliver content and establish direct relationships with their consumers. Their AI Policy has expanded and is allowed in games as long as it is disclosed and does not generate illegal content.
Source: https://store.steampowered.com/news/group/4145017/view/3862463747997849618
Youtube is a video-sharing platform where users can watch, upload, and share videos that cover a range of topics and interests. Their AI Policy has been updated to include disclosures on content that has been artificially made.
Source: https://blog.youtube/inside-youtube/our-approach-to-responsible-ai-innovation/
Everyday Health is a trusted source of evidence-based health and medical information, aiming to empower its readers to live their healthiest lives with informative, supportive, and empathetic content. Their AI policy ensures that any content generated by AI undergoes the same rigorous editorial processes as other content.
Source: https://www.everydayhealth.com/editorial-policies/
Mayo Clinic provides accurate, easy to understand, inclusive and science-based health information to help their readers make informed decisions about their well-being. They may use AI tools in the developments and translation of health information but do not use it to replace editorial judgment or oversight.
Source: https://www.mayoclinic.org/about-this-site/health-information-policy
SBNation is a large independent sports media brand where readers can stay up to date on all sports related news and information. They follow the Vox Media Editorial Ethics & Guidelines which states that the use of AI is used as a tool to enhance original work, and that all AI assisted articles must follow the editorial standards and principles and will be disclosed when appropriate.
Source: https://corp.voxmedia.com/ethics/#use-of-generative-ai
Best Colleges provides students with comprehensive resources, this includes research, guides, rankings, and career resources, in order to help them make informed decisions about their education and future careers. Their AI policy states that AI can be used in keeping with the editorial standards, will be disclosed when used, and is fact-checked and reviewed by multiple members before publishing
Source: https://www.bestcolleges.com/ai-policy/
Bankrate is one of the trusted sources readers look to for objective financial information, they offer award-winning editorial content, product comparison tools, objective reviews and more to help readers make informed decisions. Their AI policy is that while they may use AI tools to enhance editorial workflow while also aiming to maintain the strict ethical standards of accuracy, transparency, and human oversight. They also state that they will provide a clear disclosure to readers where AI is used.
Source: https://www.bankrate.com/ai-policy/
Medscape is a trusted online resource for physicians and healthcare professionals that provides them with comprehensive clinical information, medical news, expert perspectives and more.They use AI during content creation and all content is assisted with human oversight and fact-checking to ensure that it meets editorial standards and is reviewed by experts and in-house medical editors before publishing.
Source: https://www.medscape.com/public/editorialpolicies
Flyertalk is a robust community that is dedicated to travel, where they offer discussions and chat boards where participants can learn about the latest travel information. Part of the InternetBrands parent company their terms of use they state that some of the content has been created with the use of AI tools and that all AI use is aligned with their policies and procedures.
Source: https://www.internetbrands.com/ibterms/
Cars Direct is a site to buy cars, but also provides its users with car buying advice and care reviews. Part of the InternetBrands parent company their terms of use they state that some of the content has been created with the use of AI tools and that all AI use is aligned with their policies and procedures.
Source: https://www.internetbrands.com/ibterms/
Avvo is an online community that connects users with legal professionals, offering their readers lawyer referrals, access to legal information, and lawyer profiles. Part of the InternetBrands parent company their terms of use they state that some of the content has been created with the use of AI tools and that all AI use is aligned with their policies and procedures.
Source: https://www.internetbrands.com/ibterms/
Men’s Health is a trusted men’s magazine brand that offers its readers expert-backed advice on health, fitness, fashion and more.They use AI for research purposes but do not use AI for reporting, writing, or fact-checking their content.
Source: https://www.menshealth.com/about/a29134632/about-mens-health/
The Federal government of Canada has created their own guide for federal institutions beginning to explore the potential uses of AI tools. In this guide they advise institutions to explore AI for activities where possible risks can be managed effectively. They also advise that institutions should align themselves with the “FASTER” principles (Fair, Accountable, Secure, Transparent, Educated,Relevant).
Seneca is a public college that offers a large range of polytechnic education programs that blends academic rigor with practical training across various fields. Seneca does not ban the use of AI but only allows the use of pre-approved non public AI tools, and all content generated by the tools must follow their ethical standards and principles.
Source: https://www.senecapolytechnic.ca/about/policies/generative-ai-policy.html
Queen’s University is a public research intensive university located in Ontario, Canada. Within their guidelines they state that AI tools are permitted in some graduate research activities, so long as their use is authorized prior to use, it is disclosed, and doesn’t compromise the originality of a student’s contribution or knowledge.
Kickstarter is a crowdfunding platform that empowers creators to turn their ideas into reality by connecting them with communities willing to fund and support their projects. They do allow projects that use AI tools, but require creators to disclose their use, including specific technology and how it will be used, and they must ensure their project remains original and creative.
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
Have you seen a thought leadership LinkedIn post and wondered if it was AI-generated or human-written? In this study, we looked at the impact of ChatGPT and generative AI tools on the volume of AI content that is being published on LinkedIn. These are our findings.
We believe that it is crucial for AI content detectors reported accuracy to be open, transparent, and accountable. The reality is, each person seeking AI-detection services deserves to know which detector is the most accurate for their specific use case.
