Keyword density helper – This tool comes with a built-in keyword density helper in some ways similar to the likes of SurferSEO or MarketMuse the difference being, ours is free! This feature shows the user the frequency of single or two word keywords in a document, meaning you can easily compare an article you have written against a competitor to see the major differences in keyword densities. This is especially useful for SEO’s who are looking to optimize their blog content for search engines and improve the blog’s visibility.
File compare – Text comparison between files is a breeze with our tool. Simply select the files you would like to compare, hit “Upload” and our tool will automatically insert the content into the text area, then simply hit “Compare” and let our tool show you where the differences in the text are. By uploading a file, you can still check the keyword density in your content.
Comparing text between URLs is effortless with our tool. Simply paste the URL you would like to get the content from (in our example we use a fantastic blog post by Sherice Jacob found here) hit “Submit URL” and our tool will automatically retrieve the contents of the page and paste it into the text area, then simply click “Compare” and let our tool highlight the difference between the URLs. This feature is especially useful for checking keyword density between pages!
You can also easily compare text by copying and pasting it into each field, as demonstrated below.
Ease of use
Our text compare tool is created with the user in mind, it is designed to be accessible to everyone. Our tool allows users to upload files or enter a URL to extract text, this along with the lightweight design ensures a seamless experience. The interface is simple and straightforward, making it easy for users to compare text and detect the diff.
Multiple text file format support
Our tool provides support for a variety of different text files and microsoft word formats including pdf file, .docx, .odt, .doc, and .txt, giving users the ability to compare text from different sources with ease. This makes it a great solution for students, bloggers, and publishers who are looking for file comparison in different formats.
Protects intellectual property
Our text comparison tool helps you protect your intellectual property and helps prevent plagiarism. This tool provides an accurate comparison of texts, making it easy to ensure that your work is original and not copied from other sources. Our tool is a valuable resource for anyone looking to maintain the originality of their content.
User Data Privacy
Our text compare tool is secure and protects user data privacy. No data is ever saved to the tool, the users’ text is only scanned and pasted into the tool’s text area. This makes certain that users can use our tool with confidence, knowing their data is safe and secure.
Compatibility
Our text comparison tool is designed to work seamlessly across all size devices, ensuring maximum compatibility no matter your screen size. Whether you are using a large desktop monitor, a small laptop, a tablet or a smartphone, this tool adjusts to your screen size. This means that users can compare texts and detect the diff anywhere without the need for specialized hardware or software. This level of accessibility makes it an ideal solution for students or bloggers who value the originality of their work and need to compare text online anywhere at any time.
When it comes to moderating content, whether on a forum, online publication, or in a digital classroom, it’s tempting to leave everything to AI and let the machine handle it.
However, AI is far from flawless, and depending on its training data, it can cause several issues. For instance, it can block users based on training data biases, impacting user interactions and collaboration.
How can you make sure that AI content moderation does the heavy lifting and prevent potential mishaps?
The secret is finding the right balance to combine:
Go beyond surface-level AI moderation and seek opportunities for AI automation and human judgment to work together.
Compare where automated content moderation shines and where humans need to step in.
Plagiarism detection and AI detection are particularly important in online classrooms and courses.
It’s a must to ensure that authors get credit where credit is due, and it’s also a way to support students by teaching proper citation, independent thought, and transparency.
Additionally, plagiarism and AI detection are beneficial for web publishers and marketing agencies who want to moderate their content and verify that it’s unique and original.
Plagiarism checkers are powerful tools to have on hand when moderating content, as they can quickly scan and flag potential instances of plagiarism.
These modern tools far surpass traditional plagiarism-checking software. Depending on the software, it may have the capability to compare writing patterns and context or scan databases. So, using a plagiarism checker is a fantastic moderation assistant.
The Originality.ai plagiarism detector is a superb choice for marketers and web publishers because it compares texts to Google’s search results for potential instances of plagiarism.
With Originality.ai, you can also opt to combine AI detection and plagiarism checking when you run a Content Scan, streamlining your overall moderation process.
AI checkers are another excellent way to incorporate AI content moderation into your workflow. AI checkers differ from plagiarism detectors in that they are specifically designed to uncover AI-generated text like GPT-4o-mini or Claude.
For instance, the Originality.ai Site Scanner is an asset for publishers, agencies, and writers because it enables a rapid scan of an entire website to highlight AI-generated content.
Once the plagiarism checker or AI detector has flagged potential plagiarism or AI content, this is ideally where human moderators step in to measure the accuracy of the AI moderation tool.
It’s best practice to accompany automated moderation with human review. This reduces the risk of false positives or incorrectly accusing someone of plagiarism, such as if there were quotations and citations present. Learn more about AI detector accuracy and false positives.
When it comes to automated content moderation, using human feedback to train the AI should help it improve over time so that human content moderators are only needed in more complex cases.
As AI content moderation is always learning and its algorithms are continually training on new and more relevant information, it continues to analyze its mistakes and learn from them, opening up possibilities for advanced AI moderation in the future.
As with AI content moderation, AI-based fact-checking should be a first step.
AI is excellent for verifying dates, statistics, and other types of facts. In cases of automated content moderation, it’s a good idea to have artificial intelligence crunch the data to see if this or that fact is actually verifiable.
Originality.ai offers an automated fact-checker that runs an internally built AI to help copy editors and web publishers streamline their fact-checking process.
However, just like when using AI to moderate comments or check for plagiarism, it’s a smart idea to have a ‘human in the loop.’ AI fact-checkers can do a first pass on the content, and then humans can delve into the more nuanced claims or complex cases.
Misinformation is becoming more complex, and fact-checking is increasingly important. By working together, both humans and AI can flag incorrect facts to uncover and correct them.
When moderating content, it’s important to find a reliable balance between AI handling the heavy workload and human moderators involved as a second check.
Just as AI continues to learn what type of content is appropriate and what isn’t, human moderators can also benefit from training around misinformation and disinformation, sensitivities, and applying decisions in a way that’s fair and understandable.
Human judgment is vital to recognizing and taking steps to deal with bias. Remember, AI is only as good as the material it’s trained on, and bias can be hard to uncover.
Taking steps to correct those biases goes a long way toward training AI to handle more content moderation duties.
Content moderation isn’t always as straightforward as checking a box that says, ‘This is plagiarism,’ or ‘This is biased.’
Sometimes, it involves complex and sensitive issues. This is where a human moderator is required who has the ability to understand the (oftentimes deeply) emotional impact of content and take steps to remedy it.
AI lacks the empathy needed to hear both sides of a particular scenario with fairness and an open mind. On the other hand, humans can engage in ongoing dialogue with the affected users, consider the full context, and offer explanations.
Many issues revolving around humans and AI in content moderation can be sidestepped by having clear roles and transparent guidance on how decisions are made. Making users feel included in the process cultivates good community habits and encourages members to recognize and abide by the rules.
When it comes to AI content moderation, there are some things best left to AI and others that require a more human touch.
When training and using AI for content moderation, let it handle the task of flagging posts for plagiarism, AI content, or inaccurate facts.
Then, involve human moderators in more complex cases, who can perform in-depth fact-checks, review instances of plagiarism, and add a human perspective to emotional decisions.
By continuing to train and oversee the development of AI in content moderation and balancing it with human insight, you can cultivate the kind of place that people appreciate being a part of and enjoy participating in.
No, that’s one of the benefits, only fill out the areas which you think will be relevant to the prompts you require.
When making the tool we had to make each prompt as general as possible to be able to include every kind of input. Not to worry though ChatGPT is smart and will still understand the prompt.
Originality.ai did a fantastic job on all three prompts, precisely detecting them as AI-written. Additionally, after I checked with actual human-written textual content, it did determine it as 100% human-generated, which is important.
Vahan Petrosyan
searchenginejournal.com
I use this tool most frequently to check for AI content personally. My most frequent use-case is checking content submitted by freelance writers we work with for AI and plagiarism.
Tom Demers
searchengineland.com
After extensive research and testing, we determined Originality.ai to be the most accurate technology.
Rock Content Team
rockcontent.com
Jon Gillham, Founder of Originality.ai came up with a tool to detect whether the content is written by humans or AI tools. It’s built on such technology that can specifically detect content by ChatGPT-3 — by giving you a spam score of 0-100, with an accuracy of 94%.
Felix Rose-Collins
ranktracker.com
ChatGPT lacks empathy and originality. It’s also recognized as AI-generated content most of the time by plagiarism and AI detectors like Originality.ai
Ashley Stahl
forbes.com
Originality.ai Do give them a shot!
Sri Krishna
venturebeat.com
For web publishers, Originality.ai will enable you to scan your content seamlessly, see who has checked it previously, and detect if an AI-powered tool was implored.
Industry Trends
analyticsinsight.net
Tools for conducting a plagiarism check between two documents online are important as it helps to ensure the originality and authenticity of written work. Plagiarism undermines the value of professional and educational institutions, as well as the integrity of the authors who write articles. By checking for plagiarism, you can ensure the work that you produce is original or properly attributed to the original author. This helps prevent the distribution of copied and misrepresented information.
Text comparison is the process of taking two or more pieces of text and comparing them to see if there are any similarities, differences and/or plagiarism. The objective of a text comparison is to see if one of the texts has been copied or paraphrased from another text. This text compare tool for plagiarism check between two documents has been built to help you streamline that process by finding the discrepancies with ease.
Text comparison tools work by analyzing and comparing the contents of two or more text documents to find similarities and differences between them. This is typically done by breaking the texts down into smaller units such as sentences or phrases, and then calculating a similarity score based on the number of identical or nearly identical units. The comparison may be based on the exact wording of the text, or it may take into account synonyms and other variations in language. The results of the comparison are usually presented in the form of a report or visual representation, highlighting the similarities and differences between the texts.
String comparison is a fundamental operation in text comparison tools that involves comparing two sequences of characters to determine if they are identical or not. This comparison can be done at the character level or at a higher level, such as the word or sentence level.
The most basic form of string comparison is the equality test, where the two strings are compared character by character and a Boolean result indicating whether they are equal or not is returned. More sophisticated string comparison algorithms use heuristics and statistical models to determine the similarity between two strings, even if they are not exactly the same. These algorithms often use techniques such as edit distance, which measures the minimum number of operations (such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions) required to transform one string into another.
Another common technique for string comparison is n-gram analysis, where the strings are divided into overlapping sequences of characters (n-grams) and the frequency of each n-gram is compared between the two strings. This allows for a more nuanced comparison that takes into account partial similarities, rather than just exact matches.
String comparison is a crucial component of text comparison tools, as it forms the basis for determining the similarities and differences between texts. The results of the string comparison can then be used to generate a report or visual representation of the similarities and differences between the texts.
Syntax highlighting is a feature of text editors and integrated development environments (IDEs) that helps to visually distinguish different elements of a code or markup language. It does this by coloring different elements of the code, such as keywords, variables, functions, and operators, based on a predefined set of rules.
The purpose of syntax highlighting is to make the code easier to read and understand, by drawing attention to the different elements and their structure. For example, keywords may be colored in a different hue to emphasize their importance, while comments or strings may be colored differently to distinguish them from the code itself. This helps to make the code more readable, reducing the cognitive load of the reader and making it easier to identify potential syntax errors.
With our tool it’s easy, just enter or upload some text, click on the button “Compare text” and the tool will automatically display the diff between the two texts.
Using text comparison tools is much easier, more efficient, and more reliable than proofreading a piece of text by hand. Eliminate the risk of human error by using a tool to detect and display the text difference within seconds.
We have support for the file extensions .pdf, .docx, .odt, .doc and .txt. You can also enter your text or copy and paste text to compare.
There is never any data saved by the tool, when you hit “Upload” we are just scanning the text and pasting it into our text area so with our text compare tool, no data ever enters our servers.
Copyright © 2023, Originality.ai
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS “AS IS” AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This table below shows a heat map of features on other sites compared to ours as you can see we almost have greens across the board!
